Determination of a Reference Value for Adequate Assessment of Teaching Situations: Development of a Technical Education Expert Norm (PCK-T)

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sebastian Goreth, Friederike Straub, M. Rehm, Bernd Geißel
{"title":"Determination of a Reference Value for Adequate Assessment of Teaching Situations: Development of a Technical Education Expert Norm (PCK-T)","authors":"Sebastian Goreth, Friederike Straub, M. Rehm, Bernd Geißel","doi":"10.30880/jtet.2020.12.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The different facets of professional performanceof teachers are being debated in the current educational research discussion. Both qualitative and quantitative test constructions exist for vignette-based measurement of competence. For economic reasons, a procedure with closed-ended items is often favored, a reference is required for determining and comparing alternative responses. This paper sketches out the procedure for identifying adequate reactions to responses that we call a technical educationexpert norm (PCK-T).Thisexpert norm is generated from a multi-stepexpert survey and, in addition, reveals possible validation steps that can be derived for developing teaching situations.After a content validation (N1=8) a multi-step quantitative survey with specialised subject expertsat schools and universities, departmental heads at public colleges for education and teacher training,as well as experienced teachers of technologywas carried out (N2=79; N3=76). In order to assess teaching competencies of pre-serviceteachers using a vignette-based test procedure, the generated technical education expert norm(PCK-T)allows adequate responses to be differentiated from (rather) inadequate responses in the teaching situations.","PeriodicalId":43208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The different facets of professional performanceof teachers are being debated in the current educational research discussion. Both qualitative and quantitative test constructions exist for vignette-based measurement of competence. For economic reasons, a procedure with closed-ended items is often favored, a reference is required for determining and comparing alternative responses. This paper sketches out the procedure for identifying adequate reactions to responses that we call a technical educationexpert norm (PCK-T).Thisexpert norm is generated from a multi-stepexpert survey and, in addition, reveals possible validation steps that can be derived for developing teaching situations.After a content validation (N1=8) a multi-step quantitative survey with specialised subject expertsat schools and universities, departmental heads at public colleges for education and teacher training,as well as experienced teachers of technologywas carried out (N2=79; N3=76). In order to assess teaching competencies of pre-serviceteachers using a vignette-based test procedure, the generated technical education expert norm(PCK-T)allows adequate responses to be differentiated from (rather) inadequate responses in the teaching situations.
教学情境充分评估参考值的确定:技术教育专家规范(PCK-T)的制定
在当前的教育研究讨论中,教师专业表现的不同方面正在进行争论。基于小插曲的能力测量既有定性测试结构,也有定量测试结构。出于经济原因,通常倾向于使用封闭项目的程序,需要参考来确定和比较备选响应。本文概述了识别对回应的适当反应的程序,我们称之为技术教育专家规范(PCK-T)。该专家规范是从多步骤专家调查中生成的,此外,还揭示了可用于开发教学情境的可能验证步骤。在内容验证(N1=8)后,对学校和大学的专业学科专家、公立教育和教师培训学院的系主任以及经验丰富的技术教师进行了多步骤定量调查(N2=79;N3=76)。为了使用基于小插曲的测试程序来评估职前教师的教学能力,生成的技术教育专家规范(PCK-T)允许在教学情况下区分适当的反应和不充分的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Technical Education and Training
Journal of Technical Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: JTET will consider for publications original research articles, critical reviews as well as technical reports that can further our understanding of TVET issues and concerns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信