Psychometric assessment of organizational readiness scale for digital innovations and antecedents of organizational readiness

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Human systems management Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.3233/hsm-220202

Besarta Taganoviq, Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan, Mehmet Bağış, Adnan Hoxha, Blerta Kryeziu, Arben Hysenaj, Erza Haxhijakupi, Altina Bimbashi, Arta Dalipi, Blerte Hyseni, Linda Ukimeraj Harris

{"title":"Psychometric assessment of organizational readiness scale for digital innovations and antecedents of organizational readiness","authors":"Besarta Taganoviq, Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan, Mehmet Bağış, Adnan Hoxha, Blerta Kryeziu, Arben Hysenaj, Erza Haxhijakupi, Altina Bimbashi, Arta Dalipi, Blerte Hyseni, Linda Ukimeraj Harris","doi":"10.3233/hsm-220202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: This article aims to perform a psychometric assessment of the scale of organizational readiness for digital innovations in a transition economy and to examine the antecedents of organizational readiness for digital innovations. METHODOLOGY: The study employed a quantitative research method to analyze data collected from a sample of 1236 health professionals. The scale secondary confirmatory factor and linear regression analysis were employed to verify organizational readiness and test the respective hypotheses about organizational readiness for digital innovation, respectively. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The research findings show that the organizational readiness scale for digital innovations is valid and reliable in transition economies. Findings show that the relationship between variables such as adaptation of human resources (AHR), cognitive readiness (COR), planning for new telehealth and e-health (PNTH), IT readiness (ITR), resource readiness (RR), partnership readiness (PR), and cultural readiness (CUR) are correlated with the innovations implementation effectiveness (IIE), and organizational readiness for digital innovation is positive statistically significant. Findings also suggest that Integration of old technologies (IoT) and organizational readiness for digital innovation is statistically significant and have negative relationship.","PeriodicalId":13113,"journal":{"name":"Human systems management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human systems management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-220202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article aims to perform a psychometric assessment of the scale of organizational readiness for digital innovations in a transition economy and to examine the antecedents of organizational readiness for digital innovations. METHODOLOGY: The study employed a quantitative research method to analyze data collected from a sample of 1236 health professionals. The scale secondary confirmatory factor and linear regression analysis were employed to verify organizational readiness and test the respective hypotheses about organizational readiness for digital innovation, respectively. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The research findings show that the organizational readiness scale for digital innovations is valid and reliable in transition economies. Findings show that the relationship between variables such as adaptation of human resources (AHR), cognitive readiness (COR), planning for new telehealth and e-health (PNTH), IT readiness (ITR), resource readiness (RR), partnership readiness (PR), and cultural readiness (CUR) are correlated with the innovations implementation effectiveness (IIE), and organizational readiness for digital innovation is positive statistically significant. Findings also suggest that Integration of old technologies (IoT) and organizational readiness for digital innovation is statistically significant and have negative relationship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

数字化创新组织准备量表的心理测量评估及组织准备的前因

背景：本文旨在对转型经济中组织对数字创新的准备程度进行心理测量评估，并考察组织对数字革新的准备程度的前因。方法：该研究采用定量研究方法分析了从1236名卫生专业人员样本中收集的数据。采用量表二次验证因子和线性回归分析分别验证了组织准备度，并检验了关于组织数字创新准备度的假设。结果/结论：研究结果表明，数字创新的组织准备程度量表在转型经济体是有效和可靠的。研究结果表明，人力资源适应度（AHR）、认知准备度（COR）、新远程医疗和电子健康规划（PNTH）、信息技术准备度（ITR）、资源准备度（RR）、伙伴关系准备度（PR）和文化准备度（CUR）等变量之间的关系与创新实施有效性（IIE）相关，组织对数字化创新的准备程度具有统计学意义。研究结果还表明，旧技术的整合（IoT）和组织对数字创新的准备程度在统计上具有显著意义，并呈负相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human systems management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

30.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Systems Management (HSM) is an interdisciplinary, international, refereed journal, offering applicable, scientific insight into reinventing business, civil-society and government organizations, through the sustainable development of high-technology processes and structures. Adhering to the highest civic, ethical and moral ideals, the journal promotes the emerging anthropocentric-sociocentric paradigm of societal human systems, rather than the pervasively mechanistic and organismic or medieval corporatism views of humankind’s recent past. Intentionality and scope Their management autonomy, capability, culture, mastery, processes, purposefulness, skills, structure and technology often determine which human organizations truly are societal systems, while others are not. HSM seeks to help transform human organizations into true societal systems, free of bureaucratic ills, along two essential, inseparable, yet complementary aspects of modern management: a) the management of societal human systems: the mastery, science and technology of management, including self management, striving for strategic, business and functional effectiveness, efficiency and productivity, through high quality and high technology, i.e., the capabilities and competences that only truly societal human systems create and use, and b) the societal human systems management: the enabling of human beings to form creative teams, communities and societies through autonomy, mastery and purposefulness, on both a personal and a collegial level, while catalyzing people’s creative, inventive and innovative potential, as people participate in corporate-, business- and functional-level decisions. Appreciably large is the gulf between the innovative ideas that world-class societal human systems create and use, and what some conventional business journals offer. The latter often pertain to already refuted practices, while outmoded business-school curricula reinforce this problematic situation.