The diffusion of innovations under normative induction in Brazil

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Gustavo de Freitas Alves, Carlos Denner dos Santos
{"title":"The diffusion of innovations under normative induction in Brazil","authors":"Gustavo de Freitas Alves, Carlos Denner dos Santos","doi":"10.1108/rausp-10-2020-0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHierarchically superior bodies develop normative instructions to induce the diffusion of innovations, stimulating the adoption of management practices in supervised public bodies and seeking public administration efficiency increase. Despite this, the effectiveness of these normative instructions is unknown, as well as its inducing and lasting effects in the diffusion of these innovations, especially in Brazil. This study aims to understand the effects of normative induction.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe adoption of risk management, integrity & ethics and information security practices was evaluated over a decade (2009 to 2019), including the adoption behavior of more than 200 Brazilian federal agencies. Public open data were collected and analyzed with multinomial logistic regression.\n\n\nFindings\nThe normative instructions’ effectiveness in propagating the evaluated practices is remarkable; however, its mere development by the superior bodies cannot be considered enough since the general adoption index can be considered good but not excellent. No evaluated practice reached a saturation level above 75%.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper contributes to bringing the international literature’s generic knowledge on the adoption of innovation to the specific Brazilian public administration context, providing insightful implications for policymakers, public managers and researchers.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis work is unique, as it systematically analyzes multiple innovation adoption and presents excellent opportunities for future researchers by reproducing all scripts and automation developed. Furthermore, all data are available and hosted on public platforms with detailed steps and documentation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe use of open data from governmental sources allows enhanced transparency and the discovery of affecting variables while observing innovation adoption in the public administration.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe presence of normative instructions and their adoption rate is rarely measured in the Brazilian public administration.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-10-2020-0250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Hierarchically superior bodies develop normative instructions to induce the diffusion of innovations, stimulating the adoption of management practices in supervised public bodies and seeking public administration efficiency increase. Despite this, the effectiveness of these normative instructions is unknown, as well as its inducing and lasting effects in the diffusion of these innovations, especially in Brazil. This study aims to understand the effects of normative induction. Design/methodology/approach The adoption of risk management, integrity & ethics and information security practices was evaluated over a decade (2009 to 2019), including the adoption behavior of more than 200 Brazilian federal agencies. Public open data were collected and analyzed with multinomial logistic regression. Findings The normative instructions’ effectiveness in propagating the evaluated practices is remarkable; however, its mere development by the superior bodies cannot be considered enough since the general adoption index can be considered good but not excellent. No evaluated practice reached a saturation level above 75%. Research limitations/implications This paper contributes to bringing the international literature’s generic knowledge on the adoption of innovation to the specific Brazilian public administration context, providing insightful implications for policymakers, public managers and researchers. Practical implications This work is unique, as it systematically analyzes multiple innovation adoption and presents excellent opportunities for future researchers by reproducing all scripts and automation developed. Furthermore, all data are available and hosted on public platforms with detailed steps and documentation. Social implications The use of open data from governmental sources allows enhanced transparency and the discovery of affecting variables while observing innovation adoption in the public administration. Originality/value The presence of normative instructions and their adoption rate is rarely measured in the Brazilian public administration.
巴西规范归纳下的创新传播
目的上级机构制定规范性指令,以促进创新的传播,激励受监督的公共机构采用管理实践,并寻求提高公共行政效率。尽管如此,这些规范性指示的有效性及其对这些创新传播的诱导和持久影响尚不清楚,尤其是在巴西。本研究旨在了解规范归纳法的效果。设计/方法/方法对风险管理、诚信与道德以及信息安全实践的采用进行了十多年(2009年至2019年)的评估,包括200多个巴西联邦机构的采用行为。收集公开数据,采用多项逻辑回归分析。发现规范性指示在宣传被评估实践方面的有效性是显著的;然而,仅仅由上级机构发展是不够的,因为一般采用指数可以被认为是好的,但并不优秀。没有一项评估实践达到75%以上的饱和水平。研究局限性/含义本文有助于将国际文献中关于采用创新的一般知识引入巴西特定的公共行政背景,为决策者、公共管理者和研究人员提供深刻的启示。实践意义这项工作是独特的,因为它系统地分析了多种创新的采用,并通过复制所有脚本和开发的自动化为未来的研究人员提供了极好的机会。此外,所有数据都可用,并托管在公共平台上,并提供详细的步骤和文档。社会含义使用政府来源的公开数据可以提高透明度,发现影响变量,同时观察公共行政中的创新采用情况。独创性/价值巴西公共行政部门很少衡量规范性指示的存在及其采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信