Psychological Perspectives on Perceptions of Black Victimhood in the United States

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Polity Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.1086/721559
M. J. Perez, P. Salter
{"title":"Psychological Perspectives on Perceptions of Black Victimhood in the United States","authors":"M. J. Perez, P. Salter","doi":"10.1086/721559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, White people often accuse Black people of playing the “race card.” This phrase is used to chastise Black people for using their history of victimization as an excuse to avoid personal accountability.Within the connotation of this phrase are assumptions about Black victimization. One assumption is that Black identity, and in turn Black victimhood, is a social resource that Black people will use strategically for their own benefit. Second, this phrase carries an assumption that being a victim by way of one’s Black identity is a desirable, beneficial social status. These assumptions of victimhood as desirable and strategic underline many academic (namely social psychological) and political constructions of victimhood. However, articulations of victimhood in social and political psychology do not often consider the history of systemic racism; nor, histories of White violence against Black people. Black people in the United States have been victimized by White physical and structural violence since the early origins of the country. Although","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":"54 1","pages":"858 - 865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the United States, White people often accuse Black people of playing the “race card.” This phrase is used to chastise Black people for using their history of victimization as an excuse to avoid personal accountability.Within the connotation of this phrase are assumptions about Black victimization. One assumption is that Black identity, and in turn Black victimhood, is a social resource that Black people will use strategically for their own benefit. Second, this phrase carries an assumption that being a victim by way of one’s Black identity is a desirable, beneficial social status. These assumptions of victimhood as desirable and strategic underline many academic (namely social psychological) and political constructions of victimhood. However, articulations of victimhood in social and political psychology do not often consider the history of systemic racism; nor, histories of White violence against Black people. Black people in the United States have been victimized by White physical and structural violence since the early origins of the country. Although
美国黑人受害者认知的心理学视角
在美国,白人经常指责黑人打“种族牌”。这句话用来谴责黑人利用自己的受害历史作为逃避个人责任的借口。这句话的内涵是对黑人受害的假设。一种假设是,黑人身份,进而是黑人受害者,是黑人将战略性地利用的一种社会资源,为自己的利益服务。其次,这个短语带有一种假设,即通过黑人身份成为受害者是一种可取的、有益的社会地位。这些将受害者身份视为可取和战略性的假设强调了受害者身份的许多学术(即社会心理)和政治建构。然而,社会和政治心理学中对受害者身份的阐述往往不考虑系统性种族主义的历史;白人对黑人施暴的历史。自美国建国之初,黑人就一直是白人身体和结构暴力的受害者。虽然
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信