How Has Covid-19 Affected Published Academic Research? A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Mentioning the Virus

M. Thelwall, Saheeda Thelwall
{"title":"How Has Covid-19 Affected Published Academic Research? A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Mentioning the Virus","authors":"M. Thelwall, Saheeda Thelwall","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Methods to tackle Covid-19 have been developed by a wave of biomedical research but the pandemic has also influenced many aspects of society, generating a need for research into its consequences, and potentially changing the way existing topics are investigated. This article investigates the nature of this influence on the wider academic research mission. Design/methodology/approach This article reports an inductive content analysis of 500 randomly selected journal articles mentioning Covid-19, as recorded by the Dimensions scholarly database on 19 March 2021. Covid-19 mentions were coded for the influence of the disease on the research. Findings Whilst two thirds of these articles were about biomedicine (e.g. treatments, vaccines, virology), or health services in response to Covid-19, others covered the pandemic economy, society, safety, or education. In addition, some articles were not about the pandemic but stated that Covid-19 had increased or decreased the value of the reported research or changed the context in which it was conducted. Research limitations The findings relate only to Covid-19 influences declared in published journal articles. Practical implications Research managers and funders should consider whether their current procedures are effective in supporting researchers to address the evolving demands of pandemic societies, particularly in terms of timeliness. Originality/value The results show that although health research dominates the academic response to Covid-19, it is more widely disrupting academic research with new demands and challenges.","PeriodicalId":92237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Methods to tackle Covid-19 have been developed by a wave of biomedical research but the pandemic has also influenced many aspects of society, generating a need for research into its consequences, and potentially changing the way existing topics are investigated. This article investigates the nature of this influence on the wider academic research mission. Design/methodology/approach This article reports an inductive content analysis of 500 randomly selected journal articles mentioning Covid-19, as recorded by the Dimensions scholarly database on 19 March 2021. Covid-19 mentions were coded for the influence of the disease on the research. Findings Whilst two thirds of these articles were about biomedicine (e.g. treatments, vaccines, virology), or health services in response to Covid-19, others covered the pandemic economy, society, safety, or education. In addition, some articles were not about the pandemic but stated that Covid-19 had increased or decreased the value of the reported research or changed the context in which it was conducted. Research limitations The findings relate only to Covid-19 influences declared in published journal articles. Practical implications Research managers and funders should consider whether their current procedures are effective in supporting researchers to address the evolving demands of pandemic societies, particularly in terms of timeliness. Originality/value The results show that although health research dominates the academic response to Covid-19, it is more widely disrupting academic research with new demands and challenges.
新冠肺炎如何影响已发表的学术研究?关于病毒的期刊文章内容分析
摘要目的生物医学研究浪潮开发了应对新冠肺炎的方法,但这场大流行也影响了社会的许多方面,产生了对其后果进行研究的需求,并可能改变现有主题的调查方式。本文探讨了这种影响对更广泛的学术研究任务的性质。设计/方法论/方法本文报告了2021年3月19日Dimensions学术数据库记录的500篇随机选择的提及新冠肺炎的期刊文章的归纳内容分析。提及新冠肺炎是为了说明该疾病对研究的影响。研究结果尽管这些文章中有三分之二是关于生物医学(如治疗、疫苗、病毒学)或应对新冠肺炎的卫生服务,但其他文章则涉及大流行性经济、社会、安全或教育。此外,一些文章不是关于大流行的,但指出新冠肺炎增加或降低了报告研究的价值,或改变了研究的背景。研究局限性研究结果仅与已发表的期刊文章中宣布的新冠肺炎影响有关。实际影响研究管理人员和资助者应考虑他们目前的程序是否有效地支持研究人员应对疫情社会不断变化的需求,特别是在及时性方面。原创/价值研究结果表明,尽管健康研究主导了学术界对新冠肺炎的反应,但它正在更广泛地扰乱学术研究,带来新的需求和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信