Metaphors we teach by

Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1075/msw.19021.har
Bridgette Martin Hard, Nathan Liang, M. Wong, S. Flusberg
{"title":"Metaphors we teach by","authors":"Bridgette Martin Hard, Nathan Liang, M. Wong, S. Flusberg","doi":"10.1075/msw.19021.har","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a\n sculptor molding impressionable students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous\n work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a\n more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented\n participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to\n rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a\n small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along\n these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions\n about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of\n participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational\n interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19021.har","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a sculptor molding impressionable students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.
分享
查看原文
我们用隐喻来教学
教学是一项复杂的活动,人们经常用隐喻的方式来讨论,比如教授被描述为塑造易受影响学生的雕塑家。这些隐喻揭示了人们如何将教学概念化?先前的工作主要通过研究人员的直觉和对教师态度的定性分析来解决相关问题。我们试图开发一种更具原则性的方法来绘制隐喻概念的含义,将教学隐喻作为一个案例研究。我们向参与者展示了四种常见的师生关系隐喻之一(在初步研究中确定),并要求他们对一系列教师属性与隐喻的匹配程度进行评分。然后,我们使用迭代探索性因素分析来确定人们对教师概念的少数维度,并检验隐喻是否在这些维度上存在系统性差异。我们发现,教学隐喻让人想起了不同的、连贯的教师属性集群以及对教师责任和权力的不同直觉——我们在一项更大的、预先注册的后续研究中使用了一组新的参与者,重复了这一发现。这项工作为绘制隐喻概念的含义提供了一种新的方法,并为以转变教学理论为中心的教育干预奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信