Entering the Ethical Space Between Epistemologies: A Step Toward Decolonizing the Heart and Mind

J. Billman
{"title":"Entering the Ethical Space Between Epistemologies: A Step Toward Decolonizing the Heart and Mind","authors":"J. Billman","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i44.759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a tipping point marked by knowledge fragmentation, the evaluation field’s ability to address the complex problems confronting the world today is threatened. Contributing to this is the field’s narrowed epistemological foundation which places limits on what counts as knowledge, alienating many engaged with it. Privileging empirical knowledge over traditional and revealed (i.e., spiritual) knowledge places the reigning evaluation paradigms at odds with Indigenous paradigms and presents numerous risks to individuals, communities, and ecosystems. Yet, if we enter the space between epistemologies (Emine, 2007), we discover that the founders of western philosophy, Aristotle and Descartes, held many ideas in common with Indigenous philosophies. Here I deconstruct Western thought to show how Aristotle and Descartes upheld an immaterial reality, with Descartes grounding all his understanding in revealed knowledge. After providing a bombardment of multidisciplinary support for revealed knowledge, I argue that embracing the Knowledge Trinity advances the decolonization of evaluator self and mind and provides a new epistemological foundation upon which to construct a Decolonizing Paradigm.","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i44.759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At a tipping point marked by knowledge fragmentation, the evaluation field’s ability to address the complex problems confronting the world today is threatened. Contributing to this is the field’s narrowed epistemological foundation which places limits on what counts as knowledge, alienating many engaged with it. Privileging empirical knowledge over traditional and revealed (i.e., spiritual) knowledge places the reigning evaluation paradigms at odds with Indigenous paradigms and presents numerous risks to individuals, communities, and ecosystems. Yet, if we enter the space between epistemologies (Emine, 2007), we discover that the founders of western philosophy, Aristotle and Descartes, held many ideas in common with Indigenous philosophies. Here I deconstruct Western thought to show how Aristotle and Descartes upheld an immaterial reality, with Descartes grounding all his understanding in revealed knowledge. After providing a bombardment of multidisciplinary support for revealed knowledge, I argue that embracing the Knowledge Trinity advances the decolonization of evaluator self and mind and provides a new epistemological foundation upon which to construct a Decolonizing Paradigm.
进入认识论之间的伦理空间:迈向心灵非殖民化的一步
在知识碎片化的转折点上,评价领域解决当今世界面临的复杂问题的能力受到威胁。造成这种情况的原因是该领域的认识论基础狭窄,限制了什么是知识,疏远了许多参与其中的人。将经验知识凌驾于传统和揭示的(即精神)知识之上,使主导的评估范式与土著范式不一致,并给个人、社区和生态系统带来了许多风险。然而,如果我们进入认识论之间的空间(Emine,2007),我们会发现西方哲学的创始人亚里士多德和笛卡尔与土著哲学有许多共同的思想。在这里,我解构了西方思想,以展示亚里士多德和笛卡尔是如何维护非物质现实的,笛卡尔的所有理解都建立在揭示的知识中。在为揭示的知识提供了多学科支持之后,我认为,接受知识三位一体促进了评估者自我和思想的非殖民化,并为构建非殖民化范式提供了新的认识论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信