Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa SMP/MTs yang Bergaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik pada Konten Pengukuran dan Geometri

Resti Elmi Mubarkah, Masriyah Masriyah
{"title":"Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa SMP/MTs yang Bergaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik pada Konten Pengukuran dan Geometri","authors":"Resti Elmi Mubarkah, Masriyah Masriyah","doi":"10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n1.p176-193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UNESCO emphasizes that one of the determinants of the progress of a nation is numeracy skills. The numeracy skills of Indonesian students are still unsatisfactory. Students' understanding of measurement and geometry content is very low so their learning outcomes are also low. Low numeracy skills and poor understanding of the material in measurement and geometry content are caused by various things, such as learning styles. Each student has a different learning style, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research is qualitative descriptive research according to its aim to describe the numeracy abilities of SMP/MTs students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles in measurement and geometry content. The subjects of this study were three students of class VIII-B at MTs Negeri 1 Magetan with different learning styles and equal mathematical abilities. Methods of data collection in this study are through a learning style questionnaire, written tests, and interviews. The written test is in the form of a math ability test and a numeration assignment. The results of this study were: 1) student with a visual learning style mastered the indicators of communication skills, mathematization, choosing strategies to solve problems, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations while indicators of numeracy skills that were not mastered were indicators of representational and reasoning abilities and argument; 2) student with an auditory learning style master indicators of communication skills, mathematization, and choosing strategies to solve problems while indicators of numeracy skills that are not mastered are indicators of representation, reasoning and argument abilities, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations; 3) student with a kinesthetic learning style only master indicators of mathematical ability and choose strategies to solve problems while indicators of numeracy skills that are not mastered are indicators of communication, representation, reasoning and argument abilities, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations.","PeriodicalId":31516,"journal":{"name":"MATHEdunesa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATHEdunesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n1.p176-193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UNESCO emphasizes that one of the determinants of the progress of a nation is numeracy skills. The numeracy skills of Indonesian students are still unsatisfactory. Students' understanding of measurement and geometry content is very low so their learning outcomes are also low. Low numeracy skills and poor understanding of the material in measurement and geometry content are caused by various things, such as learning styles. Each student has a different learning style, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research is qualitative descriptive research according to its aim to describe the numeracy abilities of SMP/MTs students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles in measurement and geometry content. The subjects of this study were three students of class VIII-B at MTs Negeri 1 Magetan with different learning styles and equal mathematical abilities. Methods of data collection in this study are through a learning style questionnaire, written tests, and interviews. The written test is in the form of a math ability test and a numeration assignment. The results of this study were: 1) student with a visual learning style mastered the indicators of communication skills, mathematization, choosing strategies to solve problems, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations while indicators of numeracy skills that were not mastered were indicators of representational and reasoning abilities and argument; 2) student with an auditory learning style master indicators of communication skills, mathematization, and choosing strategies to solve problems while indicators of numeracy skills that are not mastered are indicators of representation, reasoning and argument abilities, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations; 3) student with a kinesthetic learning style only master indicators of mathematical ability and choose strategies to solve problems while indicators of numeracy skills that are not mastered are indicators of communication, representation, reasoning and argument abilities, and using language and symbolic, formal, and technical operations.
视觉、听觉和动觉学生在测量和几何内容中的编号能力
联合国教科文组织强调,一个国家进步的决定因素之一是计算能力。印尼学生的计算能力仍然不尽如人意。学生对测量和几何内容的理解很低,因此他们的学习成绩也很低。算术能力低下,对测量和几何内容中的材料理解不足是由各种因素造成的,比如学习风格。每个学生都有不同的学习风格,如视觉、听觉和动觉的学习风格。本研究是一项定性描述性研究,旨在描述具有视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的SMP/MTs学生在测量和几何内容方面的算术能力。本研究的受试者是麦哲坦国立大学VIII-B班的三名学生,他们具有不同的学习风格和同等的数学能力。本研究的数据收集方法是通过学习风格问卷、书面测试和访谈。笔试采用数学能力测试和记数作业的形式。本研究的结果是:1)视觉学习风格的学生掌握了沟通技能、数学化、解决问题的策略选择以及语言和符号、形式和技术操作的指标,而未掌握的算术技能指标是表征和推理能力以及论点的指标;2) 具有听觉学习风格的学生掌握沟通技能、数学化和选择解决问题策略的指标,而未掌握的算术技能指标是表示、推理和论证能力,以及使用语言和符号、形式和技术操作的指标;3) 动觉学习风格的学生只掌握数学能力指标和解决问题的策略选择,而未掌握的算术技能指标是沟通、表达、推理和论证能力指标,以及使用语言和符号、形式和技术操作的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信