Justice, Revenge, and Unexpected Theodicy in Lars Von Trier's Dogville and Euripides' Medea

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1353/are.2021.0007
B. Haller
{"title":"Justice, Revenge, and Unexpected Theodicy in Lars Von Trier's Dogville and Euripides' Medea","authors":"B. Haller","doi":"10.1353/are.2021.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Lars von Trier's 2003 film Dogville shares extensive plot parallels with Euripides' Medea. Through elements such as classical and Biblical names (Jason, Achilles, Grace) and Greek words scrawled on a chalkboard, von Trier invites his viewer to read the film against its classical intertexts. Most prominent is the film's Medea-like plot, in which a female protagonist seeks refuge within a strange community, gradually comes to be abused by this same community, is confronted with patently fantastical and sophistic attempts to rationalize this abuse, and, in a significant departure from the audience's understanding of the rules governing the dramatic universe at the outset, is revealed to possess unimaginable power to judge and punish those who have wronged her. In a final scene resembling a Greek divine epiphany, this female protagonist appears: in Medea's case, as a deus ex machina, and in Grace's, as a female reimagining of Christ in Judgment, capable of wreaking horrific vengeance on a group of complicit abusers who believed their power to be unquestioned and unassailable. Through these extended parallels with Euripides' play of 431 B.C.E., von Trier explores the nature of Hannah Arendt's famous paradox of the banality of evil: how do seemingly open, well-intentioned, and democratic communities commit and conceal from themselves the most evil crimes against humanity?","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2021.0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Lars von Trier's 2003 film Dogville shares extensive plot parallels with Euripides' Medea. Through elements such as classical and Biblical names (Jason, Achilles, Grace) and Greek words scrawled on a chalkboard, von Trier invites his viewer to read the film against its classical intertexts. Most prominent is the film's Medea-like plot, in which a female protagonist seeks refuge within a strange community, gradually comes to be abused by this same community, is confronted with patently fantastical and sophistic attempts to rationalize this abuse, and, in a significant departure from the audience's understanding of the rules governing the dramatic universe at the outset, is revealed to possess unimaginable power to judge and punish those who have wronged her. In a final scene resembling a Greek divine epiphany, this female protagonist appears: in Medea's case, as a deus ex machina, and in Grace's, as a female reimagining of Christ in Judgment, capable of wreaking horrific vengeance on a group of complicit abusers who believed their power to be unquestioned and unassailable. Through these extended parallels with Euripides' play of 431 B.C.E., von Trier explores the nature of Hannah Arendt's famous paradox of the banality of evil: how do seemingly open, well-intentioned, and democratic communities commit and conceal from themselves the most evil crimes against humanity?
拉斯·冯·提尔的《道格维尔》和欧里庇得斯的《美狄亚》中的正义、复仇和意想不到的神义
摘要:拉尔斯·冯·提尔2003年的电影《多格维尔》与欧里庇得斯的《美狄亚》有着广泛的情节相似之处。通过经典和圣经中的名字(杰森、阿喀琉斯、格蕾丝)以及黑板上潦草的希腊语等元素,冯·提尔邀请观众对照经典的互文阅读这部电影。最突出的是电影中类似美狄亚的情节,在这个情节中,一位女性主角在一个陌生的社区中寻求庇护,逐渐受到同一个社区的虐待,面临着明显的幻想和诡辩的尝试,试图将这种虐待合理化,这与观众一开始对戏剧世界规则的理解大相径庭,被揭露拥有难以想象的力量来审判和惩罚那些冤枉她的人。在一个类似于希腊神圣顿悟的最后一幕中,这位女主角出现了:在美狄亚的案例中,她是一个二人组的前阴谋家,在格蕾丝的案例中她是一位女性,她重新想象了审判中的基督,能够对一群同谋施虐者进行可怕的报复,这些施虐者相信自己的力量是不容置疑的。通过这些与欧里庇得斯公元前431年戏剧的延伸相似之处,冯·提尔探索了汉娜·阿伦特著名的平庸邪恶悖论的本质:看似开放、善意和民主的社区是如何犯下并向自己隐瞒最邪恶的反人类罪的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信