The Perception of Leaders: A Competitive Test of Social Exchange Theory and Equity Theory

D. T. Dick
{"title":"The Perception of Leaders: A Competitive Test of Social Exchange Theory and Equity Theory","authors":"D. T. Dick","doi":"10.1921/gpwk.v28i3.1303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social exchange theory and equity theory were used to examine the perception of leaders in a small group context.  Participants (n = 154), involved in a semester long group project  assessed their leaders  contributions to the task and maintenance of the group using measures gauging social exchange and equity forces.   These measures were regressed onto desire to work with the leader again in the future. Overall, the results indicate greater support for social exchange theory.","PeriodicalId":91690,"journal":{"name":"Groupwork : an interdisciplinary journal for working with groups","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groupwork : an interdisciplinary journal for working with groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v28i3.1303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social exchange theory and equity theory were used to examine the perception of leaders in a small group context.  Participants (n = 154), involved in a semester long group project  assessed their leaders  contributions to the task and maintenance of the group using measures gauging social exchange and equity forces.   These measures were regressed onto desire to work with the leader again in the future. Overall, the results indicate greater support for social exchange theory.
领导者感知:社会交换理论与公平理论的竞争检验
社会交换理论和公平理论被用来检验领导者在小群体背景下的感知。参与一个为期一学期的小组项目的参与者(n=154)使用衡量社会交换和公平力量的指标来评估他们的领导者对任务和维护小组的贡献。这些措施被倒退为希望在未来再次与领导人合作。总体而言,研究结果表明社会交换理论得到了更大的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信