The role of accounting regulation on good news recognition and conditional conservatism: evidence from China’s 2006 accounting regulation

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Zuhair Barhamzaid
{"title":"The role of accounting regulation on good news recognition and conditional conservatism: evidence from China’s 2006 accounting regulation","authors":"Zuhair Barhamzaid","doi":"10.1108/arj-08-2022-0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the impact of accounting regulation (AR) on good news (GNs) recognition and conditional conservatism (CC), using the Chinese experiment in the 2006 AR.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe current study applies the Basu (1997) model to a sample of 26,755 firm-year observations from 1997 to 2017.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study finds that GNs recognition is significantly reduced and becomes significantly less than bad news recognition under China’s 2006 AR, suggesting that CC is enhanced under China’s 2006 AR.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper excludes the financial sector from the sample. Thus, generalizing results on the financial sector is not appropriate. In addition, the available literature on this topic is limited as it deals with convergence with IFRS, not the full adoption of IFRS.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study findings are expected to benefit policymakers and accounting standard setters in controlling GNs recognition and CC as well.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhereas prior studies on this topic report their results on CC only, without considering the role of AR on GNs recognition, this paper highlights the role of AR on both GNs recognition and CC as well.\n","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-08-2022-0185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of accounting regulation (AR) on good news (GNs) recognition and conditional conservatism (CC), using the Chinese experiment in the 2006 AR. Design/methodology/approach The current study applies the Basu (1997) model to a sample of 26,755 firm-year observations from 1997 to 2017. Findings The study finds that GNs recognition is significantly reduced and becomes significantly less than bad news recognition under China’s 2006 AR, suggesting that CC is enhanced under China’s 2006 AR. Research limitations/implications This paper excludes the financial sector from the sample. Thus, generalizing results on the financial sector is not appropriate. In addition, the available literature on this topic is limited as it deals with convergence with IFRS, not the full adoption of IFRS. Practical implications The study findings are expected to benefit policymakers and accounting standard setters in controlling GNs recognition and CC as well. Originality/value Whereas prior studies on this topic report their results on CC only, without considering the role of AR on GNs recognition, this paper highlights the role of AR on both GNs recognition and CC as well.
会计准则对好消息确认和条件稳健性的作用——来自中国2006年会计准则的证据
目的本研究旨在探讨会计准则(AR)对好消息(GNs)确认和条件保守性(CC)的影响,使用2006年AR中的中国实验。设计/方法/方法本研究将Basu(1997)模型应用于1997年至2017年26755个企业年的观察样本。研究发现,在中国2006年AR下,GNs的识别显著降低,并且显著低于坏消息的识别,研究局限性/含义本文将金融部门排除在样本之外。因此,概括金融部门的结果是不合适的。此外,关于这一主题的现有文献有限,因为它涉及与《国际财务报告准则》的趋同,而不是全面采用《国际财务报表准则》。实际含义研究结果有望使决策者和会计准则制定者在控制GNs确认和CC方面受益。原创性/价值尽管先前关于该主题的研究仅报告了他们在CC上的结果,而没有考虑AR在GNs识别中的作用,但本文强调了AR在GNs识别和CC中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信