Sisters Are Doing It For Themselves: A Nationwide Study of the Social Determinants of Black & Latine Womens' Differences in HIV Testing

Fabiene Snowden, Juan Battle
{"title":"Sisters Are Doing It For Themselves: A Nationwide Study of the Social Determinants of Black & Latine Womens' Differences in HIV Testing","authors":"Fabiene Snowden, Juan Battle","doi":"10.1353/bsr.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Black and Latine women comprise 26.3% of the U.S. population, but accounted for 75% of all new HIV infections among women in 2018. Arguably, a key ingredient to reducing HIV infection rates is knowing one's status. A precursor to knowing is actually getting tested for HIV. The more information one has concerning how social determinants serve as conduits and barriers to getting testing, the more beneficial to all communities, and especially marginalized ones. To help fill this gap in knowledge, this paper utilizes Black Feminist theory and intersectionality as theoretical frameworks; employs secondary analysis of the Black and Latine female sample within the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance data from the Center for Disease Control; as well as hierarchical logistical regression modeling to examine the relative impact of health and healthcare, substance use, and key demographics on whether or not a respondent gets tested for HIV. Further, to examine racial differences between these two groups, analyses are performed first for both racial groups and then separately for Black women and Latine women.","PeriodicalId":73626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","volume":"9 1","pages":"63 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2022.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Black and Latine women comprise 26.3% of the U.S. population, but accounted for 75% of all new HIV infections among women in 2018. Arguably, a key ingredient to reducing HIV infection rates is knowing one's status. A precursor to knowing is actually getting tested for HIV. The more information one has concerning how social determinants serve as conduits and barriers to getting testing, the more beneficial to all communities, and especially marginalized ones. To help fill this gap in knowledge, this paper utilizes Black Feminist theory and intersectionality as theoretical frameworks; employs secondary analysis of the Black and Latine female sample within the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance data from the Center for Disease Control; as well as hierarchical logistical regression modeling to examine the relative impact of health and healthcare, substance use, and key demographics on whether or not a respondent gets tested for HIV. Further, to examine racial differences between these two groups, analyses are performed first for both racial groups and then separately for Black women and Latine women.
姐妹们是为了自己:一项关于黑人和拉丁裔女性艾滋病毒检测差异的社会决定因素的全国性研究
摘要:黑人和拉丁裔女性占美国人口的26.3%,但在2018年女性新增艾滋病毒感染者中占75%。可以说,降低艾滋病毒感染率的一个关键因素是了解自己的状况。知道这一点的前兆实际上是接受艾滋病毒检测。人们掌握的关于社会决定因素如何成为接受检测的渠道和障碍的信息越多,对所有社区,尤其是边缘化社区就越有利。为了填补这一知识空白,本文运用黑人女权主义理论和交叉性作为理论框架;在疾病控制中心的行为风险因素监测数据中对黑人和拉丁裔女性样本进行二次分析;以及分层逻辑回归模型,以检查健康和医疗保健、药物使用和关键人口统计对受访者是否接受艾滋病毒检测的相对影响。此外,为了检验这两个群体之间的种族差异,首先对两个种族群体进行分析,然后分别对黑人女性和拉丁裔女性进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信