Book Review: Introducing vigilant audiences. Open Book Publishers by D. Trottier, R. Gabdulhakov and Q. Huang

IF 1.4 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Bleakley
{"title":"Book Review: Introducing vigilant audiences. Open Book Publishers by D. Trottier, R. Gabdulhakov and Q. Huang","authors":"P. Bleakley","doi":"10.1177/10575677211034228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the internet as a medium for public discourse is a well-covered subject, including the role social media platforms play in facilitating and shaping that discourse. More generally, the proliferation of communication technologies in postindustrial society has functioned to blur the boundaries between the physical and online worlds. Like politicians such as former President Donald Trump, several precipitating factors have played an instrumental role in legitimizing social media as a platform for “robust” discourse. However, this type of discourse is not limited to the political sphere, with the internet serving as a place where—under the guise of accountability—a collective (often anonymous) engages in digital vigilantism or digilantism. It is this digilantism that is the central focus of Daniel Trottier, Rashid Gabdulhakov, and Qian Huang’s Introducing Vigilant Audiences (2020), an edited collection that examines the current state of research on digital vigilantism. Trottier et al. assembled a diverse cross-section of contributors in Introducing Vigilant Audiences, allowing for a truly holistic and interdisciplinary approach to a subject matter that demands it. The collection is generally divided into two sets of chapters: first, examining the nexus between entertainment and digilantism and, later, a subsequent set of chapters looking at issues such as citizenship, nationalism, and far-right populism. This second category of chapters covers, in part, terrain that has been extensively covered in existing research on the faror alt-right. However, in the context of Introducing Vigilant Audiences, the chapters from authors like Tanner, Crosset and Campana (pp. 129–160) and Milbrandt (pp. 215–258) take on new dimensions, understood in the context and from the perspective of vigilantism more broadly and reflecting enduring patterns of behavior that have been transformed by the internet but—importantly—not invented on the Internet. The contributors in Introducing Vigilant Audiences focus on examples of digilantism from various parts of the world, reflecting the geographically diverse nature of contributors. Furthermore, this collection goes beyond locale, as the contributors come from varying academic disciplines like computer ethics (Douglas) and media and communication (Driessen) to sociology (Milbrandt) and criminology (Plesnicar). The interdisciplinary tenor of the contributors shines through, making Introducing Vigilant Audiences a book that is not constrained by intradisciplinary myopia. This seems to have been a purposeful decision on Trottier et al.’s part, noting early in their introduction, “vigilant audiences entail a range of phenomena, span geographic area and vary in their motivations as well as their affiliations” (p. 1). From a criminal justice perspective, there are a number of valuable contributions in Introducing Vigilant Audiences, particularly toward the end of the collection. Early chapters, like Driessen’s work on digilantism in online pop-culture fandoms (pp. 25–48) and Linton’s timely research on the contested nature of “comedy” on the internet (pp. 77–106), have perhaps more tenuous resonance for Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":51797,"journal":{"name":"International Criminal Justice Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"469 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10575677211034228","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677211034228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of the internet as a medium for public discourse is a well-covered subject, including the role social media platforms play in facilitating and shaping that discourse. More generally, the proliferation of communication technologies in postindustrial society has functioned to blur the boundaries between the physical and online worlds. Like politicians such as former President Donald Trump, several precipitating factors have played an instrumental role in legitimizing social media as a platform for “robust” discourse. However, this type of discourse is not limited to the political sphere, with the internet serving as a place where—under the guise of accountability—a collective (often anonymous) engages in digital vigilantism or digilantism. It is this digilantism that is the central focus of Daniel Trottier, Rashid Gabdulhakov, and Qian Huang’s Introducing Vigilant Audiences (2020), an edited collection that examines the current state of research on digital vigilantism. Trottier et al. assembled a diverse cross-section of contributors in Introducing Vigilant Audiences, allowing for a truly holistic and interdisciplinary approach to a subject matter that demands it. The collection is generally divided into two sets of chapters: first, examining the nexus between entertainment and digilantism and, later, a subsequent set of chapters looking at issues such as citizenship, nationalism, and far-right populism. This second category of chapters covers, in part, terrain that has been extensively covered in existing research on the faror alt-right. However, in the context of Introducing Vigilant Audiences, the chapters from authors like Tanner, Crosset and Campana (pp. 129–160) and Milbrandt (pp. 215–258) take on new dimensions, understood in the context and from the perspective of vigilantism more broadly and reflecting enduring patterns of behavior that have been transformed by the internet but—importantly—not invented on the Internet. The contributors in Introducing Vigilant Audiences focus on examples of digilantism from various parts of the world, reflecting the geographically diverse nature of contributors. Furthermore, this collection goes beyond locale, as the contributors come from varying academic disciplines like computer ethics (Douglas) and media and communication (Driessen) to sociology (Milbrandt) and criminology (Plesnicar). The interdisciplinary tenor of the contributors shines through, making Introducing Vigilant Audiences a book that is not constrained by intradisciplinary myopia. This seems to have been a purposeful decision on Trottier et al.’s part, noting early in their introduction, “vigilant audiences entail a range of phenomena, span geographic area and vary in their motivations as well as their affiliations” (p. 1). From a criminal justice perspective, there are a number of valuable contributions in Introducing Vigilant Audiences, particularly toward the end of the collection. Early chapters, like Driessen’s work on digilantism in online pop-culture fandoms (pp. 25–48) and Linton’s timely research on the contested nature of “comedy” on the internet (pp. 77–106), have perhaps more tenuous resonance for Book Reviews
书评:介绍警惕的观众。开放图书出版社,D. Trottier, R. Gabdulhakov和Q. Huang著
利用互联网作为公共话语的媒介是一个涵盖广泛的主题,包括社交媒体平台在促进和塑造公共话语方面所发挥的作用。更普遍地说,后工业社会中通信技术的激增已经模糊了物理世界和网络世界之间的界限。与前总统唐纳德·特朗普等政客一样,一些促成因素在将社交媒体合法化为“强有力”话语的平台方面发挥了重要作用。然而,这种类型的话语并不局限于政治领域,互联网是一个集体(通常是匿名的)在问责的幌子下从事数字私刑或尊严主义的地方。丹尼尔·特罗蒂尔(Daniel Trottier)、拉希德·加布杜尔哈科夫(Rashid Gabdulhakov)和钱煌(Qian Huang)的《介绍警戒观众》(Introducing Vigilant Audiences)(2020)是一本经过编辑的合集,考察了数字警戒的研究现状。Trottier等人在《引入警惕的观众》一书中汇集了不同的贡献者,从而对需要的主题采取了真正全面和跨学科的方法。该集通常分为两章:首先,研究娱乐和尊严之间的关系,然后,随后的一系列章节着眼于公民身份、民族主义和极右翼民粹主义等问题。第二类章节在一定程度上涵盖了现有的极右翼研究中广泛涵盖的领域。然而,在介绍警惕的观众的背景下,Tanner、Crosset和Campana(第129-160页)和Milbrandt(第215-258页)等作者的章节呈现出新的维度,从更广泛的背景和私刑的角度来理解,反映了互联网改变了但重要的是,不是在互联网上发明的持久行为模式。《介绍警惕的观众》中的撰稿人专注于来自世界各地的挖掘实例,反映了撰稿人在地理上的多样性。此外,由于贡献者来自不同的学术学科,如计算机伦理学(Douglas)、媒体与传播学(Driesen)、社会学(Milbrandt)和犯罪学(Plesnicar),因此本系列超越了现场。撰稿人的跨学科基调大放异彩,使《介绍警惕的观众》成为一本不受跨学科近视限制的书。就Trottier等人而言,这似乎是一个有目的的决定,他在引言的早期指出,“警惕的受众涉及一系列现象,跨越地理区域,他们的动机和隶属关系各不相同”(第1页)。从刑事司法的角度来看,《引入警惕的观众》有许多宝贵的贡献,尤其是在该系列的结尾。早期的章节,如Driesen关于网络流行文化粉丝中的尊严主义的作品(第25-48页)和Linton对互联网上“喜剧”争议性质的及时研究(第77-106页),可能对书评产生了更微弱的共鸣
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Criminal Justice Review
International Criminal Justice Review CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: International Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting system wide trends and problems on crime and justice throughout the world. Articles may focus on a single country or compare issues affecting two or more countries. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. Manuscripts may emphasize either contemporary or historical topics. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, and commentaries that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics in an international and/or comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信