Collective norms and modern contraceptive use in men and women: A multilevel analysis of DHS Program data in Nigeria and Zambia

S. Riese, Shireen Assaf, Jeffrey D. Edmeades, Oluwatoyin Aladejebi, M. Phiri
{"title":"Collective norms and modern contraceptive use in men and women: A multilevel analysis of DHS Program data in Nigeria and Zambia","authors":"S. Riese, Shireen Assaf, Jeffrey D. Edmeades, Oluwatoyin Aladejebi, M. Phiri","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.14406.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Social norms have long been understood as essential for demographic preferences, intentions and behavior, despite a lack of consistent definitions and measures in the field. Recent work has more clearly defined these norms, both at the individual and community/collective levels. However, past research on the effect of social norms on contraceptive use has focused mainly on the influence of individual-level norms, largely among women only, contributing to mixed findings. Methods: This study addresses this gap through the use of multilevel models to identify associations between collective gender, fertility, and family planning norms and individual use of modern contraceptives for both men and women, using recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from Nigeria and Zambia. Multiple measures of variation, including community-level random effects and the intraclass correlation, are calculated, providing evidence of the general effect of community factors on behavior. Results: Our findings support the importance of social, demographic and economic context on how collective gender, fertility, and family planning norms relate to modern contraceptive use. Different social norms are associated with use in the two countries, and, even within the same country, men and women’s use are influenced by different norms. Among the examined norms, only collective fertility norms were associated with use for all the groups examined, consistently associated with lower use of modern contraception. Overall, clustering at the community level explained a larger proportion of variance in individual use in men compared to women, suggesting that men’s behavior was more consistently associated with the measured social norms than women’s. Conclusions: These findings suggest that careful attention should be paid to understanding and measuring social norms when considering programs or policy around the provision of modern contraception and that these should not assume that social norms influence men and women’s behaviors in the same way.","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14406.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Social norms have long been understood as essential for demographic preferences, intentions and behavior, despite a lack of consistent definitions and measures in the field. Recent work has more clearly defined these norms, both at the individual and community/collective levels. However, past research on the effect of social norms on contraceptive use has focused mainly on the influence of individual-level norms, largely among women only, contributing to mixed findings. Methods: This study addresses this gap through the use of multilevel models to identify associations between collective gender, fertility, and family planning norms and individual use of modern contraceptives for both men and women, using recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from Nigeria and Zambia. Multiple measures of variation, including community-level random effects and the intraclass correlation, are calculated, providing evidence of the general effect of community factors on behavior. Results: Our findings support the importance of social, demographic and economic context on how collective gender, fertility, and family planning norms relate to modern contraceptive use. Different social norms are associated with use in the two countries, and, even within the same country, men and women’s use are influenced by different norms. Among the examined norms, only collective fertility norms were associated with use for all the groups examined, consistently associated with lower use of modern contraception. Overall, clustering at the community level explained a larger proportion of variance in individual use in men compared to women, suggesting that men’s behavior was more consistently associated with the measured social norms than women’s. Conclusions: These findings suggest that careful attention should be paid to understanding and measuring social norms when considering programs or policy around the provision of modern contraception and that these should not assume that social norms influence men and women’s behaviors in the same way.
男性和女性的集体规范和现代避孕药具使用:对尼日利亚和赞比亚国土安全部项目数据的多层次分析
背景:长期以来,人们一直认为社会规范对人口偏好、意图和行为至关重要,尽管该领域缺乏一致的定义和衡量标准。最近的工作在个人和社区/集体层面更明确地界定了这些规范。然而,过去关于社会规范对避孕药具使用的影响的研究主要集中在个人层面规范的影响上,主要仅在女性中进行,结果喜忧参半。方法:本研究利用尼日利亚和赞比亚最近的人口与健康调查(DHS)数据,通过使用多层次模型来确定集体性别、生育率和计划生育规范与男性和女性个人使用现代避孕药具之间的关联,来解决这一差距。计算了多种变异指标,包括社区水平的随机效应和组内相关性,为社区因素对行为的总体影响提供了证据。结果:我们的研究结果支持社会、人口和经济背景对集体性别、生育率和计划生育规范如何与现代避孕药具使用相关的重要性。不同的社会规范与两国的使用有关,即使在同一个国家,男性和女性的使用也受到不同规范的影响。在被检查的规范中,只有集体生育规范与所有被检查组的使用有关,这始终与较低的现代避孕使用有关。总体而言,与女性相比,社区层面的聚类解释了男性在个人使用方面的差异比例更大,这表明男性的行为与衡量的社会规范的相关性比女性更一致。结论:这些发现表明,在考虑提供现代避孕的计划或政策时,应仔细注意理解和衡量社会规范,不应假设社会规范以同样的方式影响男性和女性的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信