Ranking Veterinary Dispensaries in Odisha Using DEA and PCA

Q2 Social Sciences
H. S. Ganesha
{"title":"Ranking Veterinary Dispensaries in Odisha Using DEA and PCA","authors":"H. S. Ganesha","doi":"10.1177/0973005220971941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of measuring efficiencies of service delivery of veterinary dispensaries (VDs) and ranking them is an unexplored territory. However, since governments spend considerable amounts of money on promoting service delivery of VDs to enable animal production and productivity, and thereby promote rural livelihoods, efficiency measurement and ranking of VDs based on efficiency are necessary in a futuristic ‘transparency in governance’ environment apart from guiding in better performance. Given the non-quantifiable nature of the production function of veterinary service delivery, a non-parametric method like data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be an answer. Hence, this study measures the efficiencies of 101 VDs belonging to 2 ecosystems in Odisha, India, using DEA and ranks them using principal component analysis (PCA) along with average efficiency based on multiple data models. Analysis of various variables in models revealed that the presence or absence of variables—institutions; vaccination; a weighted variable combining castration, insurance and training (CIT); large animals’ population; and breedable animals’ population—lead to differences in average efficiencies. PCA of efficiency scores reveals that vaccination, CIT and large animal population are significant in factor loadings on first principal component (PC). The study finds high correlation between ranking based on average efficiency and ranking based on PCA, suggesting that the two methods are comparable. Both the efficiency measures and ranking reveal that VDs of the coastal ecosystem performed better than those of the western ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":39177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rural Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"7 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0973005220971941","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0973005220971941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The idea of measuring efficiencies of service delivery of veterinary dispensaries (VDs) and ranking them is an unexplored territory. However, since governments spend considerable amounts of money on promoting service delivery of VDs to enable animal production and productivity, and thereby promote rural livelihoods, efficiency measurement and ranking of VDs based on efficiency are necessary in a futuristic ‘transparency in governance’ environment apart from guiding in better performance. Given the non-quantifiable nature of the production function of veterinary service delivery, a non-parametric method like data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be an answer. Hence, this study measures the efficiencies of 101 VDs belonging to 2 ecosystems in Odisha, India, using DEA and ranks them using principal component analysis (PCA) along with average efficiency based on multiple data models. Analysis of various variables in models revealed that the presence or absence of variables—institutions; vaccination; a weighted variable combining castration, insurance and training (CIT); large animals’ population; and breedable animals’ population—lead to differences in average efficiencies. PCA of efficiency scores reveals that vaccination, CIT and large animal population are significant in factor loadings on first principal component (PC). The study finds high correlation between ranking based on average efficiency and ranking based on PCA, suggesting that the two methods are comparable. Both the efficiency measures and ranking reveal that VDs of the coastal ecosystem performed better than those of the western ecosystem.
使用DEA和PCA对奥迪沙的兽医药房进行排名
衡量兽医药房提供服务的效率并对其进行排名的想法是一个尚未探索的领域。然而,由于政府花费了大量资金来促进VDs的服务提供,以实现动物生产和生产力,从而促进农村生计,因此,在未来的“治理透明”环境中,除了指导更好的绩效外,效率测量和基于效率的VDs排名是必要的。鉴于兽医服务提供的生产函数的不可量化性质,数据包络分析(DEA)等非参数方法可能是一个答案。因此,本研究使用DEA测量了印度奥迪沙2个生态系统的101个VDs的效率,并使用主成分分析(PCA)和基于多个数据模型的平均效率对其进行了排名。对模型中各种变量的分析揭示了变量的存在与否——制度;接种疫苗阉割、保险和培训相结合的加权变量(CIT);大型动物种群;以及可繁殖动物的种群——导致平均效率的差异。有效性得分的主成分分析表明,疫苗接种、CIT和大型动物种群在第一主成分(PC)的因子负荷方面显著。研究发现,基于平均效率的排名和基于主成分分析的排名之间存在高度相关性,表明这两种方法具有可比性。效率测度和排序都表明,沿海生态系统的VDs表现优于西部生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Rural Management
International Journal of Rural Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信