{"title":"Dalibor Veselý’s Performance of Crisis","authors":"Joseph Bedford","doi":"10.1080/10464883.2022.2097513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a key formative moment in Dalibor Veselý’s life in Prague in the 1960s in the context of dissident forms of artistic production in which he attempted to publicly oppose the ideological constraints of socialist Czechoslovakia. Within this context, which occurred just before his emigration to the United Kingdom, Veselý developed a particular metaphysical language—that of heights and depths, truth and falsity, interiority and exteriority, impossible tensions and necessary choices—and he carried this language with him throughout his career as an architectural educator as a discourse of crisis. This paper interprets Veselý’s later discourse of crisis, therefore, as having its roots partly in the philosophical anthropology and phenomenology that he was studying in the 1960s, yet it goes on to argue that its political import came from the way in which ideological constraints operated in the 1960s, creating a sense of political and socio-economic brokenness, both in the socialist East and capitalist West. In contrast to the increasingly commonly accepted view indebted to the legacy of poststructuralism that such a metaphysical language is inherently foundationalist, this paper argues that it is possible to view such a discourse as a performance; which is to say, as something that seeks to imagine a degree of certainty for the purposes of fostering sentiments and committments, precisely when no such certainty exists. In spite of Veselý’s leaning towards the themes of tradition, myth and European culture, it is nonetheless possible to view his performance of crisis as a discursive tool useful today in helping individuals mark a moment of truth, and take a stand against a world which they perceive to be false and clouded in ideological constraints.","PeriodicalId":15044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural Education","volume":"76 1","pages":"70 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2022.2097513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper describes a key formative moment in Dalibor Veselý’s life in Prague in the 1960s in the context of dissident forms of artistic production in which he attempted to publicly oppose the ideological constraints of socialist Czechoslovakia. Within this context, which occurred just before his emigration to the United Kingdom, Veselý developed a particular metaphysical language—that of heights and depths, truth and falsity, interiority and exteriority, impossible tensions and necessary choices—and he carried this language with him throughout his career as an architectural educator as a discourse of crisis. This paper interprets Veselý’s later discourse of crisis, therefore, as having its roots partly in the philosophical anthropology and phenomenology that he was studying in the 1960s, yet it goes on to argue that its political import came from the way in which ideological constraints operated in the 1960s, creating a sense of political and socio-economic brokenness, both in the socialist East and capitalist West. In contrast to the increasingly commonly accepted view indebted to the legacy of poststructuralism that such a metaphysical language is inherently foundationalist, this paper argues that it is possible to view such a discourse as a performance; which is to say, as something that seeks to imagine a degree of certainty for the purposes of fostering sentiments and committments, precisely when no such certainty exists. In spite of Veselý’s leaning towards the themes of tradition, myth and European culture, it is nonetheless possible to view his performance of crisis as a discursive tool useful today in helping individuals mark a moment of truth, and take a stand against a world which they perceive to be false and clouded in ideological constraints.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Architectural Education (JAE) has been published since 1947 for the purpose of enhancing architectural scholarship in design, history, urbanism, cultural studies, technology, theory, and practice. Published on behalf of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, JAE appears twice annually in October and March, with the October issue being the first of a new volume.