{"title":"Old English intensifiers","authors":"James M. Stratton","doi":"10.1075/jhl.20011.str","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier\n system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this\n system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on\n intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn\n with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this\n system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher\n intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate\n of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth\n necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact\n and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20011.str","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier
system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this
system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on
intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn
with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this
system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher
intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate
of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth
necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact
and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.