Old English intensifiers

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
James M. Stratton
{"title":"Old English intensifiers","authors":"James M. Stratton","doi":"10.1075/jhl.20011.str","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier\n system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this\n system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on\n intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn\n with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this\n system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher\n intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate\n of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth\n necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact\n and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20011.str","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.
古英语增强词
虽然许多研究采用了变元主义方法来研究英语强化系统的纵向变化,但迄今为止,还没有变元主义研究涉及古英语的强化系统。本研究在英语历史的早期阶段对这一系统进行了批判,增加了关于强化词的长期学术传统,同时对其历时发展提供了新的见解。尽管它很古老,但在语言的后期阶段,可以将其与增强器系统进行一些比较。发现内部和外部因素都制约着这一系统,表语形容词比定语形容词更倾向于强化,散文文本比韵文文本具有更高的强化率,拉丁语文本比白话文文本具有更强的强化率并且强化率随着时间的推移而增加。对古英语系统的定量分析也增加了更详细地反思强化词的历时循环、替换和更新所需的时间深度。语言接触和借用也被认为是英语早期阶段创新和替代的驱动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信