Burying Mountjoy and Penelope Rich: King James, the Heralds and a Counter-statement from the Poet Samuel Daniel

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART
J. Pitcher
{"title":"Burying Mountjoy and Penelope Rich: King James, the Heralds and a Counter-statement from the Poet Samuel Daniel","authors":"J. Pitcher","doi":"10.1086/720360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bourdieu’s concept of ‘symbolic capital’ has been used to study various kinds of elites. This article shows how it can help us understand the status and privileges of early modern English courtiers—and how these could be won and lost. The discussion focuses on the funeral, burial and commemoration of the most successful of contemporary generals, Charles Blount, 1st Earl of Devonshire, 8th Baron Mountjoy (1563–1606), and sets these in the context of the Jacobean court’s concern with symbolic capital. It demonstrates that the ceremonies normally accorded someone of Mountjoy’s rank and military success were not observed properly. He was penalised because he had married his long-standing lover, Lady Penelope Rich (1563–1607), the ‘Stella’ of Sir Philip Sidney’s sonnets. King James I showed the couple great favour until their marriage, which he declared unlawful and annulled. The heralds accepted his ruling, after disagreeing among themselves. The article shows that though the funeral was held in Westminster Abbey, Mountjoy was not buried there but in another London church, formerly known as Greyfriars, where a monument was erected to him. Lady Rich was personally and symbolically excluded from the funeral. Also discussed is the privately printed poem that Mountjoy’s client Samuel Daniel (1562–1619) wrote for the funeral, which defends Mountjoy and alludes, in a half-hidden way, to Penelope’s exclusion. The article concludes by considering how the symbolic capital of the whole court sank in this period. Most of the archival evidence considered has not been published before, some of it illustrated in figures, the rest in appendices (an armorial description of Mountjoy’s arms at his funeral, bills from the Westminster Abbey funeral and a translated extract from a contemporary history in Latin).","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"85 1","pages":"71 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bourdieu’s concept of ‘symbolic capital’ has been used to study various kinds of elites. This article shows how it can help us understand the status and privileges of early modern English courtiers—and how these could be won and lost. The discussion focuses on the funeral, burial and commemoration of the most successful of contemporary generals, Charles Blount, 1st Earl of Devonshire, 8th Baron Mountjoy (1563–1606), and sets these in the context of the Jacobean court’s concern with symbolic capital. It demonstrates that the ceremonies normally accorded someone of Mountjoy’s rank and military success were not observed properly. He was penalised because he had married his long-standing lover, Lady Penelope Rich (1563–1607), the ‘Stella’ of Sir Philip Sidney’s sonnets. King James I showed the couple great favour until their marriage, which he declared unlawful and annulled. The heralds accepted his ruling, after disagreeing among themselves. The article shows that though the funeral was held in Westminster Abbey, Mountjoy was not buried there but in another London church, formerly known as Greyfriars, where a monument was erected to him. Lady Rich was personally and symbolically excluded from the funeral. Also discussed is the privately printed poem that Mountjoy’s client Samuel Daniel (1562–1619) wrote for the funeral, which defends Mountjoy and alludes, in a half-hidden way, to Penelope’s exclusion. The article concludes by considering how the symbolic capital of the whole court sank in this period. Most of the archival evidence considered has not been published before, some of it illustrated in figures, the rest in appendices (an armorial description of Mountjoy’s arms at his funeral, bills from the Westminster Abbey funeral and a translated extract from a contemporary history in Latin).
埋葬Mountjoy和Penelope Rich:詹姆斯国王、赫拉德家族和诗人塞缪尔·丹尼尔的反驳
布迪厄的“象征资本”概念已经被用来研究各种各样的精英。这篇文章展示了它如何帮助我们理解现代早期英国朝臣的地位和特权,以及这些地位和特权是如何赢得和失去的。讨论的重点是当代最成功的将军查尔斯·布朗特、第一代德文郡伯爵、第八代芒乔伊男爵(1563–1606)的葬礼、葬礼和纪念活动,并将其置于雅各布宫廷对象征资本的关注背景下。这表明,通常授予Mountjoy级别的人的仪式和军事上的成功没有得到适当的遵守。他之所以受到惩罚,是因为他娶了他的长期情人佩内洛普·里奇夫人(1563-1607),也就是菲利普·西德尼爵士十四行诗中的“斯特拉”。国王詹姆斯一世对这对夫妇非常恩宠,直到他们的婚姻被他宣布为非法并宣告无效。传令官们在意见相左后接受了他的裁决。文章显示,虽然葬礼在威斯敏斯特大教堂举行,但Mountjoy并没有被埋葬在那里,而是被埋葬在另一座伦敦教堂,前身为Greyfriars,那里为他竖立了纪念碑。里奇夫人个人和象征性地被排除在葬礼之外。还讨论了Mountjoy的客户Samuel Daniel(1562-1619)为葬礼写的一首私人印刷的诗,这首诗为Mountjoy辩护,并以半隐藏的方式暗示佩内洛普被排除在外。文章最后对整个朝廷的象征资本在这一时期是如何沉没的进行了思考。所考虑的大多数档案证据以前都没有发表过,其中一些以数字说明,其余以附录说明(Mountjoy葬礼上手臂的纹章描述、威斯敏斯特教堂葬礼的账单以及拉丁语当代史的翻译摘录)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信