The real preschoolers of Orange County: Early number learning in a diverse group of children

Q2 Mathematics
B. Sarnecka, James Negen, Nicole R. Scalise, Meghan C. Goldman, Jeffrey N. Rouder
{"title":"The real preschoolers of Orange County: Early number learning in a diverse group of children","authors":"B. Sarnecka, James Negen, Nicole R. Scalise, Meghan C. Goldman, Jeffrey N. Rouder","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/atzys","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors assessed a battery of number skills in a sample of over 500 preschoolers, including bothmonolingual and bilingual/multilingual learners from households at a range of socio-economic levels.Receptive vocabulary was measured in English for all children, and also in Spanish for those who spoke it.The first goal of the study was to describe entailment relations among numeracy skills: Findings indicatedthat transitive and intransitive counting were jointly required for understanding cardinality; that cardinalityand knowledge of written number symbols were both required for using number lines. The study’s secondgoal was to describe relations between symbolic numeracy and language context (i.e., monolingual vs.bilingual contexts), separating these from well-documented socio-economic influences such as householdincome and parental education: Language context had only a modest effect on numeracy, with nodifferences detectable on most tasks. However, a difference did appear on the scaffolded number-line task,where bilingual learners performed slightly better than monolinguals. The third goal of the study was to findout whether symbolic number knowledge for one subset of children (Spanish/English bilingual learnersfrom low-income households) differed when tested in their home language (Spanish) vs. their language ofpreschool instruction (English): Findings indicated that children performed as well or better in English thanin Spanish for all measures, even when their receptive vocabulary scores in Spanish were higher than inEnglish.","PeriodicalId":36632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/atzys","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors assessed a battery of number skills in a sample of over 500 preschoolers, including bothmonolingual and bilingual/multilingual learners from households at a range of socio-economic levels.Receptive vocabulary was measured in English for all children, and also in Spanish for those who spoke it.The first goal of the study was to describe entailment relations among numeracy skills: Findings indicatedthat transitive and intransitive counting were jointly required for understanding cardinality; that cardinalityand knowledge of written number symbols were both required for using number lines. The study’s secondgoal was to describe relations between symbolic numeracy and language context (i.e., monolingual vs.bilingual contexts), separating these from well-documented socio-economic influences such as householdincome and parental education: Language context had only a modest effect on numeracy, with nodifferences detectable on most tasks. However, a difference did appear on the scaffolded number-line task,where bilingual learners performed slightly better than monolinguals. The third goal of the study was to findout whether symbolic number knowledge for one subset of children (Spanish/English bilingual learnersfrom low-income households) differed when tested in their home language (Spanish) vs. their language ofpreschool instruction (English): Findings indicated that children performed as well or better in English thanin Spanish for all measures, even when their receptive vocabulary scores in Spanish were higher than inEnglish.
奥兰治县真正的学龄前儿童:不同儿童群体的早期数字学习
作者对500多名学龄前儿童的一组数字技能进行了评估,其中包括来自不同社会经济水平家庭的单语和双语/多语言学习者。该研究的第一个目标是描述算术技能之间的隐含关系:研究结果表明,传递计数和不及物计数是理解基数所必需的;基数和书写数字符号的知识都是使用数字线所必需的。该研究的第二个目标是描述符号算术和语言环境(即单语与双语环境)之间的关系,将其与家庭收入和父母教育等有据可查的社会经济影响区分开来:语言环境对算术的影响不大,在大多数任务中都没有发现差异。然而,在脚手架式的数字线任务中确实出现了差异,双语学习者的表现略好于单语学习者。该研究的第三个目标是找出一个子集儿童(来自低收入家庭的西班牙语/英语双语学习者)在用母语(西班牙语)和学前教育语言(英语)测试时的符号数知识是否不同:研究结果表明,在所有测量中,儿童的英语表现都与西班牙语一样好或更好,即使他们西班牙语的接受性词汇得分高于英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Journal of Numerical Cognition Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信