Topos of Donbas as a Narrative Phenomenon in the Ukrainian Culture of the XX–XXI Centuries: Observations, Analysis, Summarizing

O. Romanenko
{"title":"Topos of Donbas as a Narrative Phenomenon in the Ukrainian Culture of the XX–XXI Centuries: Observations, Analysis, Summarizing","authors":"O. Romanenko","doi":"10.31861/PYTLIT2018.98.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the course of Donbas representation in the Ukrainian literature and culture of the 20–21th is described. Artworks of that times have been analyzed here in context of geographical metaphors forming and presentativeimpressions about Donbas as a whole socio-cultural area. Three types of Donbas's perception in Ukrainian literature have been identified. The first one is based on metaphorical comprehension of vision of steppe and hard work. This type was formed in Ukrainian literature in the first decades of XX century. For example, in the works of Spyrydon Cherkasenko or Mykola Cherniavsky. The second one is based on the idea of heroic labor and industrialization. Its formation dates back to the 1920s and 1930s. This was especially shown in the artistic and journalistic works that were published on the pages of magazines “New Generation”, “Zaboy”. And in the 1970s it came out in Peter Shelest’s and Oleksiy Tykhogo’s publications. The third type of the Donbas perception appeared as a result of social changes at the end of the XX century. Its main component is the motive of existential emptiness. In the article, this is described on the example of the analysis of Serhiy Zhadan’s works and in the public speeches of Yaroslav Hrytsak and Olena Styazhkina. Aspects of topic exploring in the context of memory investigation in modern humanities have been outlined in the article.","PeriodicalId":32028,"journal":{"name":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31861/PYTLIT2018.98.081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article the course of Donbas representation in the Ukrainian literature and culture of the 20–21th is described. Artworks of that times have been analyzed here in context of geographical metaphors forming and presentativeimpressions about Donbas as a whole socio-cultural area. Three types of Donbas's perception in Ukrainian literature have been identified. The first one is based on metaphorical comprehension of vision of steppe and hard work. This type was formed in Ukrainian literature in the first decades of XX century. For example, in the works of Spyrydon Cherkasenko or Mykola Cherniavsky. The second one is based on the idea of heroic labor and industrialization. Its formation dates back to the 1920s and 1930s. This was especially shown in the artistic and journalistic works that were published on the pages of magazines “New Generation”, “Zaboy”. And in the 1970s it came out in Peter Shelest’s and Oleksiy Tykhogo’s publications. The third type of the Donbas perception appeared as a result of social changes at the end of the XX century. Its main component is the motive of existential emptiness. In the article, this is described on the example of the analysis of Serhiy Zhadan’s works and in the public speeches of Yaroslav Hrytsak and Olena Styazhkina. Aspects of topic exploring in the context of memory investigation in modern humanities have been outlined in the article.
顿巴斯地形作为二十世纪至二十一世纪乌克兰文化中的一种叙事现象:观察、分析、总结
本文叙述了顿巴斯在20—21世纪乌克兰文学和文化中的表现历程。在这里,我们从地理隐喻的形成和对顿巴斯作为一个社会文化区域的呈现印象的角度来分析那个时代的艺术作品。乌克兰文学中顿巴斯的感知有三种类型。第一部分是基于对草原景象和辛勤劳动的隐喻理解。这种类型形成于二十世纪前几十年的乌克兰文学中。例如,在Spyrydon Cherkasenko或Mykola Cherniavsky的作品中。第二个是基于英雄劳动和工业化的思想。它的形成可以追溯到20世纪20年代和30年代。这一点在《新一代》、《Zaboy》杂志上发表的艺术和新闻作品中尤为明显。20世纪70年代,它出现在彼得·谢莱斯特和奥列克西·泰霍戈的出版物中。第三种类型的顿巴斯认知是二十世纪末社会变革的结果。它的主要组成部分是存在空虚的动机。本文以谢尔盖·扎丹的作品分析为例,以雅罗斯拉夫·赫里察克和奥列娜·施蒂亚兹金娜的公开演讲为例进行论述。本文概述了在现代人文学科记忆调查的背景下进行主题探索的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信