Émilie Raymond, Christopher W. Tremblay, Jean-Guy Lebel
{"title":"Optimizing older adult co-researchers’ involvement in PAR: proposed evaluation tool","authors":"Émilie Raymond, Christopher W. Tremblay, Jean-Guy Lebel","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-12-2021-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to share a practical evaluation tool intended to guide and support the participation of older people in PAR projects. Participatory action research (PAR) studies with older adults have been increasing over the past ten years. Scientific evidence provides key principles for PAR projects to achieve meaningful participation by older people; however, respecting the ideals of PAR is not always straightforward.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper presents a case study that evaluated the involvement of nonacademic researchers in a PAR project using an evaluation tool derived from a literature review of PAR undertaken with this population (Corrado et al., 2020). The study goals were first to assess the assets and limits of the older co-researchers’ participation within the PAR project, and second to provide a revised version of the evaluation tool to support future PAR with older people. First, the authors designed an evaluation tool for nonacademic participation in PAR studies by older people that covers three main themes: older people positioned as prominent research partners; symmetrical power relations between academic and nonacademic researchers; and commitment regarding inclusiveness and long-term collaboration. Second, the authors performed an evaluation using this tool within the Active Aging with Dignity PAR Project.\n\n\nFindings\nThird, the authors used the results of this experiment to suggest improvements for an enhanced version of the evaluation tool aiming at supporting fuller involvement of older nonacademic researchers in PAR studies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors’ knowledge, this evaluative tool is a methodological innovation in gerontology.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-12-2021-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to share a practical evaluation tool intended to guide and support the participation of older people in PAR projects. Participatory action research (PAR) studies with older adults have been increasing over the past ten years. Scientific evidence provides key principles for PAR projects to achieve meaningful participation by older people; however, respecting the ideals of PAR is not always straightforward.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper presents a case study that evaluated the involvement of nonacademic researchers in a PAR project using an evaluation tool derived from a literature review of PAR undertaken with this population (Corrado et al., 2020). The study goals were first to assess the assets and limits of the older co-researchers’ participation within the PAR project, and second to provide a revised version of the evaluation tool to support future PAR with older people. First, the authors designed an evaluation tool for nonacademic participation in PAR studies by older people that covers three main themes: older people positioned as prominent research partners; symmetrical power relations between academic and nonacademic researchers; and commitment regarding inclusiveness and long-term collaboration. Second, the authors performed an evaluation using this tool within the Active Aging with Dignity PAR Project.
Findings
Third, the authors used the results of this experiment to suggest improvements for an enhanced version of the evaluation tool aiming at supporting fuller involvement of older nonacademic researchers in PAR studies.
Originality/value
To the authors’ knowledge, this evaluative tool is a methodological innovation in gerontology.
目的本文旨在分享一种实用的评估工具,旨在指导和支持老年人参与标准杆数项目。在过去的十年中,对老年人的参与性行动研究(标准杆数)不断增加 年。科学证据为标准杆数项目提供了关键原则,以实现老年人有意义的参与;然而,尊重标准杆数的理想并不总是直截了当的。设计/方法论/方法本文提出了一个案例研究,该研究使用来自对该人群进行的标准杆数文献综述的评估工具,评估了非学术研究人员参与标准杆数项目的情况(Corrado et al.,2020)。研究目标首先是评估老年同事参与标准杆数项目的资产和限制,其次是提供评估工具的修订版本,以支持老年人未来的标准杆数。首先,作者为老年人非学术参与标准杆数研究设计了一个评估工具,涵盖三个主要主题:老年人被定位为突出的研究伙伴;学术与非学术研究者之间的对称权力关系;以及对包容性和长期合作的承诺。第二,作者在具有尊严的活跃老龄化标准杆数项目中使用该工具进行了评估。第三,作者使用该实验的结果建议改进评估工具的增强版本,旨在支持老年非学术研究人员更充分地参与标准杆数研究。原创性/价值据作者所知,这种评估工具是老年学的一种方法创新。