School zone road safety assessment using the iRAP Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) methodology in Khorasan Razavi Province

Ali Zayerzadeha, Mohsen Fallah Zavareh
{"title":"School zone road safety assessment using the iRAP Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) methodology in Khorasan Razavi Province","authors":"Ali Zayerzadeha, Mohsen Fallah Zavareh","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Abstract Students who walk to school often have to deal with traffic, weather conditions and other distractions along the way. Every hour, nearly 150 children between ages 0 and 19 are treated in emergency departments for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes. More children ages 5 to 19 die from crash-related injuries than from any other type of injury. In this research road safety situation around 7 primary schools along Khorasan Razavi province rural roads were assessed using the Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) methodology. Safety improvement treatments were done in 3 schools and reassessment of schools showed meaningful safety enhancement both in allocated score and star rating. Background Road crashes have been shown to be the leading cause of death of children and young adults aged 5–29 (WHO, 2018), indicating that compared to other causes of unintentional injuries, road injuries account for more years of potential life lost (YPLL) (Gardner & Sanborn, 1990 pp. 322) for the children. Estimates show that everyday more than 500 children lose their lives due to road crashes (WHO, 2015). Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) has been claimed to be the first ever systematic and evidence-based tool developed by iRAP (International Road Assessment Programme). Methods: The method is mainly based on engineering assessment of the school area at high risk locations. However, it is challenging to detect high risk locations in the lack of road crashes or in the lack of adequate accident data. For school assessment, different data for 7 schools such as traffic volume, number of students, operational speed, road width, crossing facilities, etc were gathered and using the iRAP SR4S application safety scores calculated. Results: In selected method lower score equals safer school zone. 3 schools with highest safety assessment scores were selected for treatments implementation by local road authority. Reassessment of school zones showed significant improvement in safety scores. The safety score for Shohada, Imam Ali and Azmoodeh School were 243,192 and 65 respectively that decreased to 37, 11 and 10 after treatment. In SR4S it means the start rating for these 1-star schools has been improved to 3,4 and 2-star respectively. Conclusions: Higher star for a school zone, however, means safer provided infrastructure and facilities for school students but the behavior of road users is the factor must be considered as well and education and enforcement still have their key roles for saving more lives on the road. Keywords: Student, School zone, Safety assessment, Star rating, References gardner","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Abstract Students who walk to school often have to deal with traffic, weather conditions and other distractions along the way. Every hour, nearly 150 children between ages 0 and 19 are treated in emergency departments for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes. More children ages 5 to 19 die from crash-related injuries than from any other type of injury. In this research road safety situation around 7 primary schools along Khorasan Razavi province rural roads were assessed using the Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) methodology. Safety improvement treatments were done in 3 schools and reassessment of schools showed meaningful safety enhancement both in allocated score and star rating. Background Road crashes have been shown to be the leading cause of death of children and young adults aged 5–29 (WHO, 2018), indicating that compared to other causes of unintentional injuries, road injuries account for more years of potential life lost (YPLL) (Gardner & Sanborn, 1990 pp. 322) for the children. Estimates show that everyday more than 500 children lose their lives due to road crashes (WHO, 2015). Star Rating for Schools (SR4S) has been claimed to be the first ever systematic and evidence-based tool developed by iRAP (International Road Assessment Programme). Methods: The method is mainly based on engineering assessment of the school area at high risk locations. However, it is challenging to detect high risk locations in the lack of road crashes or in the lack of adequate accident data. For school assessment, different data for 7 schools such as traffic volume, number of students, operational speed, road width, crossing facilities, etc were gathered and using the iRAP SR4S application safety scores calculated. Results: In selected method lower score equals safer school zone. 3 schools with highest safety assessment scores were selected for treatments implementation by local road authority. Reassessment of school zones showed significant improvement in safety scores. The safety score for Shohada, Imam Ali and Azmoodeh School were 243,192 and 65 respectively that decreased to 37, 11 and 10 after treatment. In SR4S it means the start rating for these 1-star schools has been improved to 3,4 and 2-star respectively. Conclusions: Higher star for a school zone, however, means safer provided infrastructure and facilities for school students but the behavior of road users is the factor must be considered as well and education and enforcement still have their key roles for saving more lives on the road. Keywords: Student, School zone, Safety assessment, Star rating, References gardner
使用iRAP学校星级评定(SR4S)方法对呼罗珊-拉扎维省的学区道路安全进行评估
摘要:背景:摘要步行上学的学生在上学途中经常要处理交通、天气状况和其他干扰因素。每小时,近150名0岁至19岁的儿童因车祸受伤在急诊室接受治疗。5至19岁的儿童死于与车祸有关的伤害比死于任何其他类型的伤害都多。在这项研究中,使用学校星级评定(SR4S)方法对呼罗珊-拉扎维省农村公路沿线7所小学的道路安全状况进行了评估。对3所学校进行了安全改进处理,对学校的重新评估显示,在分配分数和星级评定方面,安全性都有显著提高。背景道路交通事故已被证明是5至29岁儿童和年轻人死亡的主要原因(世界卫生组织,2018),这表明与其他非故意伤害原因相比,道路伤害导致儿童潜在生命损失(YPLL)的年数更多(Gardner&Sanborn,1990年,第322页)。据估计,每天有500多名儿童因车祸丧生(世界卫生组织,2015年)。学校星级评定(SR4S)被认为是iRAP(国际道路评估计划)开发的第一个系统的循证工具。方法:该方法主要基于对高风险地区学校区域的工程评估。然而,在缺乏道路碰撞或缺乏足够的事故数据的情况下,检测高风险地点具有挑战性。对于学校评估,收集了7所学校的不同数据,如交通量、学生人数、运营速度、道路宽度、交叉设施等,并使用iRAP SR4S应用程序安全分数进行计算。结果:在选定的方法中,分数越低,学校区域越安全。选择了3所安全评估得分最高的学校,由当地道路管理部门实施处理。对学区的重新评估显示,安全分数有了显著提高。Shohada、Imam Ali和Azmoodeh学校的安全性得分分别为243192和65,治疗后分别降至37、11和10。在SR4S中,这意味着这些一星级学校的起始评级已分别提高到3、4和2星级。结论:然而,学区的星级越高,意味着为学生提供的基础设施和设施就越安全,但道路使用者的行为也是必须考虑的因素,教育和执法在挽救更多道路生命方面仍然发挥着关键作用。关键词:学生,学区,安全评估,星级评定,参考资料gardner
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信