Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment by Noah Shusterman (review)

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Parkinson
{"title":"Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment by Noah Shusterman (review)","authors":"R. Parkinson","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the year that Armed Citizens was published, Americans bought 22,800,000 guns, shattering all previous records. The exploding gun culture in the United States takes as its mantra the last phrase of the Second Amendment to the Constitution that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Advocates, lobbyists, politicians, and judges who demand total gun freedom ignore the first words of the amendment, that that right is dependent on “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” Those defenders rest their arguments upon the “original intent” of “the Founders,” but, Noah Shusterman argues in his excellent examination of the long historical roots of the Second Amendment, when they bypass the first words to get to the “keep and bear” bit, they distort the real purposes of that provision. As a result, Shusterman states in his opening sentence, “the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution no longer makes sense” (1). Without this context—the ideological history of militias—it is impossible to understand what the Second Amendment “meant to the generation that created it” (1).","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the year that Armed Citizens was published, Americans bought 22,800,000 guns, shattering all previous records. The exploding gun culture in the United States takes as its mantra the last phrase of the Second Amendment to the Constitution that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Advocates, lobbyists, politicians, and judges who demand total gun freedom ignore the first words of the amendment, that that right is dependent on “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” Those defenders rest their arguments upon the “original intent” of “the Founders,” but, Noah Shusterman argues in his excellent examination of the long historical roots of the Second Amendment, when they bypass the first words to get to the “keep and bear” bit, they distort the real purposes of that provision. As a result, Shusterman states in his opening sentence, “the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution no longer makes sense” (1). Without this context—the ideological history of militias—it is impossible to understand what the Second Amendment “meant to the generation that created it” (1).
《武装公民:从古罗马到第二修正案》作者:诺亚·舒斯特曼
在《武装公民》出版的那一年,美国人购买了22800000支枪支,打破了之前的所有记录。美国爆炸性的枪支文化以宪法第二修正案的最后一句话为口头禅,即“人民持有和携带武器的权利不应受到侵犯。”要求完全枪支自由的倡导者、说客、政客和法官无视修正案的第一句话,这项权利取决于“一支管理良好的民兵,这是自由国家安全所必需的,它们歪曲了该条款的真正目的。因此,舒斯特曼在开场白中表示,“美国宪法第二修正案不再有意义”(1)。如果没有这一背景——民兵的意识形态历史——就不可能理解第二修正案“对创造它的那一代人意味着什么”(1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信