Subnational incorporation of economic, social and cultural rights – can devolution become a vehicle for progressive human rights reform?

Katie Boyle, N. Busby
{"title":"Subnational incorporation of economic, social and cultural rights – can devolution become a vehicle for progressive human rights reform?","authors":"Katie Boyle, N. Busby","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Devolution acts as both a foundation and a potential vehicle for progressive human rights reform. This article examines progress within the current Scottish framework, including the incorporation of international treaties, as recommended by the National Taskforce for Human Rights Leadership. The particular nature of devolution provides the opportunity to close the accountability gap in the protection of economic, social and cultural rights which operate in devolved areas, including the right to health, the right to housing and the right to an adequate standard of living. This reform brings opportunities to embrace normative international standards that facilitate incorporation such as multi-institutional accountability, proportionality-inflected reasonableness review, dignity and collective justice, as well as substantive equality measures. Progress to date is examined against the risks posed to human rights by the erosion of devolution through a number of United Kingdom(UK)-led strategies, particularly in response to Brexit-related policy gaps. Although devolution can act as an important anchor on national reform, mitigating threats to backsliding on rights at the national level, increasing centralisation can make this difficult to realise in practice. The potential opportunities offered by enhanced devolution could provide a fully integrated human rights framework incorporating social and economic policy areas such as employment, social security, immigration and equality. However, given current constitutional arrangements, devolution’s promise as a force for human rights progress is limited. The article concludes with a reframing of human rights which reflects the more complex picture painted by diverging trajectories in each of the UK jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":83211,"journal":{"name":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Devolution acts as both a foundation and a potential vehicle for progressive human rights reform. This article examines progress within the current Scottish framework, including the incorporation of international treaties, as recommended by the National Taskforce for Human Rights Leadership. The particular nature of devolution provides the opportunity to close the accountability gap in the protection of economic, social and cultural rights which operate in devolved areas, including the right to health, the right to housing and the right to an adequate standard of living. This reform brings opportunities to embrace normative international standards that facilitate incorporation such as multi-institutional accountability, proportionality-inflected reasonableness review, dignity and collective justice, as well as substantive equality measures. Progress to date is examined against the risks posed to human rights by the erosion of devolution through a number of United Kingdom(UK)-led strategies, particularly in response to Brexit-related policy gaps. Although devolution can act as an important anchor on national reform, mitigating threats to backsliding on rights at the national level, increasing centralisation can make this difficult to realise in practice. The potential opportunities offered by enhanced devolution could provide a fully integrated human rights framework incorporating social and economic policy areas such as employment, social security, immigration and equality. However, given current constitutional arrangements, devolution’s promise as a force for human rights progress is limited. The article concludes with a reframing of human rights which reflects the more complex picture painted by diverging trajectories in each of the UK jurisdictions.
地方政府纳入经济、社会和文化权利——权力下放能否成为进步人权改革的工具?
权力下放既是渐进式人权改革的基础,也是一种潜在的工具。本文审查了苏格兰当前框架内的进展情况,包括根据国家人权领导工作组的建议纳入国际条约。权力下放的特殊性质为缩小在权力下放地区保护经济、社会和文化权利方面的问责差距提供了机会,这些权利包括健康权、住房权和适足生活水平权。这项改革带来了接受规范性国际标准的机会,这些标准有助于纳入多机构问责制、基于比例的合理性审查、尊严和集体正义以及实质性平等措施。通过联合王国(英国)领导的一些战略,特别是针对与脱欧相关的政策差距,对照权力下放受到侵蚀对人权构成的风险,审查了迄今为止的进展情况。尽管权力下放可以作为国家改革的重要支柱,减轻国家层面权利倒退的威胁,但日益集中的权力下放可能会使这一点难以在实践中实现。加强权力下放所提供的潜在机会可以提供一个全面综合的人权框架,其中包括就业、社会保障、移民和平等等社会和经济政策领域。然而,鉴于目前的宪法安排,权力下放作为人权进步力量的承诺是有限的。文章最后对人权进行了重新定义,反映了英国每个司法管辖区不同轨迹所描绘的更为复杂的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信