Better Accountancy for a Real Hopenhagen

R. Czeskleba-Dupont
{"title":"Better Accountancy for a Real Hopenhagen","authors":"R. Czeskleba-Dupont","doi":"10.17265/1548-6605/2021.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is questioned whether states, cities, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can solve the climate problem when rejecting to learn from critical scrutiny of their decisions. The Danish example of massive scale conversions from fossil to biomass sources for combustion-derived energy is a case in point, as it cannot be generalized. Historical as well as actual measurements since 1958 show that the world is living with an exceptionally high and rising level of atmospheric concentration of CO2. Additions (“sources”) and subtractions (“sinks”) have, therefore, to be considered as comprehensively as possible. Biological sinks must be better protected and expanded. The role of forests in climate mitigation is generally judged too optimistically without due regard to the threat of tipping points and short-term contributions to global warming from using woody biomass for energy purposes. Under the aim of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to stabilize CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere at a level in accord with the precautionary principle, the reporting of national emissions must comprise CO2 emissions from the combustion of biomass, too. Since the Kyoto-phrase that “biomass fuels are considered CO2 neutral” in the energy sector has no consistent backing in the land sector, the complexities of real forest development must be considered. Protection must be prioritized to avoid that more forests tip into becoming net sources of greenhouse gases—and forest potentials to draw down CO2 from the atmosphere are foregone. Therefore, carbon accounting must be extended from the one-sided approach of reckoning with “Kyoto-CO2” from fossil sources only to integrated assessments of, how to decarbonize, i.e., reduce CO2 emissions from the use of biomass sources, too. To become sustainable, correcting erroneous accountancy is a first step to be taken. Instead of using problematic carbon calculators, integrated energy planning for clean renewables can help, e.g., at city level.","PeriodicalId":57290,"journal":{"name":"美中法律评论:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美中法律评论:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2021.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is questioned whether states, cities, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can solve the climate problem when rejecting to learn from critical scrutiny of their decisions. The Danish example of massive scale conversions from fossil to biomass sources for combustion-derived energy is a case in point, as it cannot be generalized. Historical as well as actual measurements since 1958 show that the world is living with an exceptionally high and rising level of atmospheric concentration of CO2. Additions (“sources”) and subtractions (“sinks”) have, therefore, to be considered as comprehensively as possible. Biological sinks must be better protected and expanded. The role of forests in climate mitigation is generally judged too optimistically without due regard to the threat of tipping points and short-term contributions to global warming from using woody biomass for energy purposes. Under the aim of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to stabilize CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere at a level in accord with the precautionary principle, the reporting of national emissions must comprise CO2 emissions from the combustion of biomass, too. Since the Kyoto-phrase that “biomass fuels are considered CO2 neutral” in the energy sector has no consistent backing in the land sector, the complexities of real forest development must be considered. Protection must be prioritized to avoid that more forests tip into becoming net sources of greenhouse gases—and forest potentials to draw down CO2 from the atmosphere are foregone. Therefore, carbon accounting must be extended from the one-sided approach of reckoning with “Kyoto-CO2” from fossil sources only to integrated assessments of, how to decarbonize, i.e., reduce CO2 emissions from the use of biomass sources, too. To become sustainable, correcting erroneous accountancy is a first step to be taken. Instead of using problematic carbon calculators, integrated energy planning for clean renewables can help, e.g., at city level.
更好的会计为真正的哥本哈根
人们质疑,当各州、城市和非政府组织拒绝从对其决定的严格审查中吸取教训时,它们是否能够解决气候问题。丹麦从化石能源大规模转化为生物质能源用于燃烧衍生能源的例子就是一个很好的例子,因为它不能一概而论。自1958年以来的历史和实际测量表明,世界正生活在异常高且不断上升的大气二氧化碳浓度水平中。因此,必须尽可能全面地考虑增加(“来源”)和减少(“汇”)。必须更好地保护和扩大生物汇。人们普遍过于乐观地判断森林在减缓气候变化方面的作用,而没有适当考虑到将木质生物质用于能源目的对全球变暖的临界点和短期影响的威胁。根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)将大气中的二氧化碳浓度稳定在符合预防原则的水平的目标,国家排放量的报告也必须包括生物质燃烧产生的二氧化碳排放量。由于《京都议定书》中关于能源部门“生物质燃料被认为是二氧化碳中性的”这句话在土地部门没有一贯的支持,因此必须考虑到真正的森林开发的复杂性。必须优先考虑保护,以避免更多的森林成为温室气体的净来源,从而放弃森林从大气中吸收二氧化碳的潜力。因此,碳核算必须从只计算化石来源的“Kyoto-CO2”的片面方法扩展到对如何脱碳的综合评估,即减少使用生物质来源的二氧化碳排放。要实现可持续发展,纠正错误会计是第一步。清洁可再生能源的综合能源规划可以提供帮助,而不是使用有问题的碳计算器,例如在城市层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
609
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书