Political Power and Housing Provision in Contemporary South Africa: Khutsong Township Settlement Project

Politeia Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.25159/2663-6689/7242
J. Zaaiman, Gift Mupambwa
{"title":"Political Power and Housing Provision in Contemporary South Africa: Khutsong Township Settlement Project","authors":"J. Zaaiman, Gift Mupambwa","doi":"10.25159/2663-6689/7242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article interrogates the power dynamics in Khutsong Township from the prism of applicable theories on urban politics. The housing project in the Khutsong Township was unique due to a change in the initial objective. The intention was a resettlement project due to dolomite hazards; but it eventually became a settlement project. This was a result of the core role-players who affected the outcomes of the project, based on their interpretation of the main aspects. The article reports the empirical study on these power relationships and compares the results to the mentioned urban political theories. From the main findings, it can be concluded that the local power situation in this project is explained best by referring to hyper-pluralism, party hegemony and a negative public choice perspective. The article thereby reveals the unique and dynamic multi-directionality of the power exercised in this case. Thus, the article contributes to understanding power configurations that may emerge in housing projects within South Africa.","PeriodicalId":32317,"journal":{"name":"Politeia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6689/7242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article interrogates the power dynamics in Khutsong Township from the prism of applicable theories on urban politics. The housing project in the Khutsong Township was unique due to a change in the initial objective. The intention was a resettlement project due to dolomite hazards; but it eventually became a settlement project. This was a result of the core role-players who affected the outcomes of the project, based on their interpretation of the main aspects. The article reports the empirical study on these power relationships and compares the results to the mentioned urban political theories. From the main findings, it can be concluded that the local power situation in this project is explained best by referring to hyper-pluralism, party hegemony and a negative public choice perspective. The article thereby reveals the unique and dynamic multi-directionality of the power exercised in this case. Thus, the article contributes to understanding power configurations that may emerge in housing projects within South Africa.
当代南非的政治权力与住房供应:Khutsong乡镇聚落项目
本文从城市政治适用理论的角度对昆松镇的权力动态进行了探讨。由于最初目标的改变,Khutsong镇的住房项目是独一无二的。其意图是一个由于白云石危害而进行的重新安置项目;但它最终变成了一个定居点项目。这是核心角色根据他们对主要方面的解释影响项目结果的结果。本文报告了对这些权力关系的实证研究,并将其结果与上述城市政治理论进行了比较。从主要研究结果可以得出结论,本项目中的地方权力状况最好通过参考超多元主义、政党霸权和消极的公共选择视角来解释。文章由此揭示了在这种情况下行使权力的独特性和动态性。因此,本文有助于理解南非住房项目中可能出现的电力配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信