Activation of latissimus dorsi muscle in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction when lifting a load

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Zully Rocío Rincón Rueda, A. Oliveira, Carolina Ramirez
{"title":"Activation of latissimus dorsi muscle in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction when lifting a load","authors":"Zully Rocío Rincón Rueda, A. Oliveira, Carolina Ramirez","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD) may be observed in 13% to 30% people with idiopathic low back pain (LBP). Latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle works by stabilizing the SIJ, providing a pathway for force transmission through the thoraco lumbar fascia. Literature has shown that muscles can change their activation pattern in response to pain, altering motor control. However, to date, there have been no studies evaluating the EMG activity of LD in people with SIJD while lifting a load, this could guide for a better understanding about how muscle activation occurs in this group of patients. AIM: To evaluate and compare activation of LD in people with LBP, SIJD and without LBP in load lifting. METHODS: One hundred fourteen people were evaluated and divided into 3 groups: LBP, SIJD and Control group. EMG signals were recorded from LD while the subjects lifted a load in a symmetrical posture. Subjects started in an upright position, grasped the box from the floor and returned to the initial position with flexed elbows. Root Mean Square (RMS) amplitude and latency were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis and the post hoc Dunn’s tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Results showed that left LD in SIJD group is activated 26.21% more than in the control group and 23.98% than the LBP group (p = 0.02). Besides, right LD has a delayed onset in SIJD by 0.68 ms compare with the control group and 0.29 ms with LBP group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a specific group of individuals with SIJD, alterations in LD muscle activation, could be evidenced by an increased RMS amplitude which is accompanied with a delay in activation in the opposite side during lifting a load in a symmetrical posture.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD) may be observed in 13% to 30% people with idiopathic low back pain (LBP). Latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle works by stabilizing the SIJ, providing a pathway for force transmission through the thoraco lumbar fascia. Literature has shown that muscles can change their activation pattern in response to pain, altering motor control. However, to date, there have been no studies evaluating the EMG activity of LD in people with SIJD while lifting a load, this could guide for a better understanding about how muscle activation occurs in this group of patients. AIM: To evaluate and compare activation of LD in people with LBP, SIJD and without LBP in load lifting. METHODS: One hundred fourteen people were evaluated and divided into 3 groups: LBP, SIJD and Control group. EMG signals were recorded from LD while the subjects lifted a load in a symmetrical posture. Subjects started in an upright position, grasped the box from the floor and returned to the initial position with flexed elbows. Root Mean Square (RMS) amplitude and latency were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis and the post hoc Dunn’s tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Results showed that left LD in SIJD group is activated 26.21% more than in the control group and 23.98% than the LBP group (p = 0.02). Besides, right LD has a delayed onset in SIJD by 0.68 ms compare with the control group and 0.29 ms with LBP group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a specific group of individuals with SIJD, alterations in LD muscle activation, could be evidenced by an increased RMS amplitude which is accompanied with a delay in activation in the opposite side during lifting a load in a symmetrical posture.
骶髂关节功能障碍患者负重时背阔肌的激活
背景:13%至30%的特发性腰痛(LBP)患者可观察到骶髂关节功能障碍(SIJD)。背阔肌(LD)通过稳定SIJ发挥作用,为通过胸腰椎筋膜传递力提供途径。文献表明,肌肉可以改变其对疼痛的激活模式,从而改变运动控制。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究评估SIJD患者在举重时LD的EMG活动,这可能有助于更好地了解这组患者的肌肉激活是如何发生的。目的:评估和比较LBP、SIJD和非LBP患者在举重中LD的激活情况。方法:将114人随机分为LBP组、SIJD组和对照组。当受试者以对称姿势举起重物时,记录LD的EMG信号。受试者以直立姿势开始,从地板上抓住盒子,然后弯曲肘部回到初始姿势。计算均方根(RMS)振幅和潜伏期。Kruskal-Wallis和事后Dunn测试用于比较各组。结果:SIJD组左LD激活率比对照组高26.21%,比LBP组高23.98%(p = 0.02)。此外,右LD在SIJD中的发病延迟0.68 ms与对照组相比为0.29 LBP组ms(p = 0.03)。结论:在一组患有SIJD的特定个体中,LD肌肉激活的改变可以通过RMS振幅的增加来证明,在以对称姿势举起负载的过程中,RMS振幅的增大伴随着对侧激活的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信