Urban flood regulating ecosystem services under climate change: how can Nature-based Solutions contribute?

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES
Thea Wübbelmann, Kristian Förster, L. Bouwer, C. Dworczyk, Steffen Bender, Benjamin Burkhard
{"title":"Urban flood regulating ecosystem services under climate change: how can Nature-based Solutions contribute?","authors":"Thea Wübbelmann, Kristian Förster, L. Bouwer, C. Dworczyk, Steffen Bender, Benjamin Burkhard","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1081850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban areas are mostly highly sealed spaces, which often leads to large proportions of surface runoff. At the same time, heavy rainfall events are projected to increase in frequency and intensity with anthropogenic climate change. Consequently, higher risks and damages from pluvial flooding are expected. The analysis of Flood Regulating Ecosystem Services (FRES) can help to determine the benefits from nature to people by reducing surface runoff and runoff peaks. However, urban FRES are rarely studied for heavy rainfall events under changing climate conditions. Therefore, we first estimate the functionality of current urban FRES-supply and demand under changing climate conditions. Second, we identify the effects of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) on FRES-supply and demand and their potential future functionality and benefits concerning more intensive rainfall events. A district of the city of Rostock in northeastern Germany serves as the case study area. In addition to the reference conditions based on the current land use, we investigate two potential NbS: (1) increasing the number of trees; and (2) unsealing and soil improvement. Both NbS and a combination of both are applied for three heavy rainfall scenarios. In addition to a reference scenario, two future scenarios were developed to investigate the FRES functionality, based on 21 and 28% more intense rainfall. While the potential FRES-demand was held constant, we assessed the FRES-supply and actual demand for all scenario combinations, using the hydrological model LEAFlood. The comparison between the actual demand and supply indicates the changes in FRES-supply surplus and unmet demand increase. Existing land use structures reached a FRES capacity and cannot buffer more intense rainfall events. Whereas, the NbS serve FRES benefits by increasing the supply and reducing the actual demand. Using FRES indicators, based on hydrological models to estimate future functionality under changing climate conditions and the benefits of NbS, can serve as an analysis and decision-support tool for decision-makers to reduce future urban flood risk.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1081850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Urban areas are mostly highly sealed spaces, which often leads to large proportions of surface runoff. At the same time, heavy rainfall events are projected to increase in frequency and intensity with anthropogenic climate change. Consequently, higher risks and damages from pluvial flooding are expected. The analysis of Flood Regulating Ecosystem Services (FRES) can help to determine the benefits from nature to people by reducing surface runoff and runoff peaks. However, urban FRES are rarely studied for heavy rainfall events under changing climate conditions. Therefore, we first estimate the functionality of current urban FRES-supply and demand under changing climate conditions. Second, we identify the effects of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) on FRES-supply and demand and their potential future functionality and benefits concerning more intensive rainfall events. A district of the city of Rostock in northeastern Germany serves as the case study area. In addition to the reference conditions based on the current land use, we investigate two potential NbS: (1) increasing the number of trees; and (2) unsealing and soil improvement. Both NbS and a combination of both are applied for three heavy rainfall scenarios. In addition to a reference scenario, two future scenarios were developed to investigate the FRES functionality, based on 21 and 28% more intense rainfall. While the potential FRES-demand was held constant, we assessed the FRES-supply and actual demand for all scenario combinations, using the hydrological model LEAFlood. The comparison between the actual demand and supply indicates the changes in FRES-supply surplus and unmet demand increase. Existing land use structures reached a FRES capacity and cannot buffer more intense rainfall events. Whereas, the NbS serve FRES benefits by increasing the supply and reducing the actual demand. Using FRES indicators, based on hydrological models to estimate future functionality under changing climate conditions and the benefits of NbS, can serve as an analysis and decision-support tool for decision-makers to reduce future urban flood risk.
气候变化下城市洪水调节生态系统服务:基于自然的解决方案如何发挥作用?
城市地区大多是高度封闭的空间,这通常会导致大量的地表径流。与此同时,预计强降雨事件的频率和强度将随着人为气候变化而增加。因此,预计洪泛会带来更高的风险和损失。洪水调节生态系统服务(FRES)的分析可以通过减少地表径流和径流峰值来帮助确定自然对人类的好处。然而,城市FRES很少针对气候条件变化下的强降雨事件进行研究。因此,我们首先估计了气候变化条件下当前城市FRES供需的功能。其次,我们确定了基于自然的解决方案(NbS)对FRES供需的影响,以及它们在未来更密集降雨事件中的潜在功能和好处。德国东北部罗斯托克市的一个区作为案例研究区。除了基于当前土地利用的参考条件外,我们还研究了两个潜在的NbS:(1)增加树木数量;以及(2)解封和土壤改良。NbS和两者的组合应用于三种强降雨情景。除了一个参考场景外,还开发了两个未来场景来调查FRES的功能,分别基于21%和28%的强降雨。虽然潜在的FRES需求保持不变,但我们使用水文模型LEAFlood评估了所有情景组合的FRES供应和实际需求。实际需求和供应之间的比较表明FRES供应过剩和未满足需求增加的变化。现有的土地利用结构已达到FRES容量,无法缓冲更强烈的降雨事件。然而,NbS通过增加供应和减少实际需求来为FRES服务。使用基于水文模型的FRES指标来估计气候变化条件下的未来功能和NbS的效益,可以作为决策者降低未来城市洪水风险的分析和决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信