Tear substitution therapy optimization of dry eye syndrome and cataract patients

Q4 Medicine
S. Sakhnov, S. Yanchenko, A. V. Malyshev, A. R. Ceeva, L. M. Petrosyan, O. A. Baskakov, G. L. Kolomiec
{"title":"Tear substitution therapy optimization of dry eye syndrome and cataract patients","authors":"S. Sakhnov, S. Yanchenko, A. V. Malyshev, A. R. Ceeva, L. M. Petrosyan, O. A. Baskakov, G. L. Kolomiec","doi":"10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-1-65-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness of approaches to tear substitution in dry eye syndrome (DES) patients before cataract phacoemulsification (CPE). Material and methods. 60 DES and cataract patients who received preoperative therapy — tear substitute instillations (4 times a day, 1 month), were examined before CPE. They were divided into 2 groups each of which was subdivided into two subgroups. Group 1 included 30 mild DES patients with lipid deficiency who had a negative lipid interference test, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and aqua deficiency absence (Schirmer-1 test > 15 mm). The subgroup 1.1 (15 patients) received 0.18 % sodium hyaluronate (SH) instillations (Gilan comfort), while the other subgroup 1.2 received “fat-water” type emulsion instillations. Group 2 consisted of 30 moderate DES patients with lipid-aqua deficiency, who also had negative lipid interference test, MGD, and aqua deficiency presence. Subgroup 2.1 (15 patients) received 0.3 % sodium hyaluronate (SH) instillations (Gilan ultra comfort), while subgroup 2.2 patients received “fat-water” type emulsion instillations. We evaluated: the OSDI points, and tear break-up time (TBUT). Results. As a result of therapy, a positive effect of the therapy on OSDI and TBUT was observed in all subgroups. In group 1 , OSDI decrease and TBUT increase were more pronounced in subgroup 1.1 patients, however, this difference between subgroups was not statistically significant. In group 2, OSDI decrease and TBUT increase were more pronounced and statistically significant in subgroup 2.1 patients. Conclusion. In patients with mild DES and lipid deficiency, 0.18 % SH (Gilan comfort) demonstrated a positive effect on OSDI and TBUT comparable to the “fat-water” type emulsion. In moderate DES patients with lipid-aqua deficiency, 0.3 % SH (Gilan ultra comfort) demonstrated a statistically significant and more pronounced positive effect on OSDI and TBUT than the “fat-water” type emulsion.","PeriodicalId":36080,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-1-65-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness of approaches to tear substitution in dry eye syndrome (DES) patients before cataract phacoemulsification (CPE). Material and methods. 60 DES and cataract patients who received preoperative therapy — tear substitute instillations (4 times a day, 1 month), were examined before CPE. They were divided into 2 groups each of which was subdivided into two subgroups. Group 1 included 30 mild DES patients with lipid deficiency who had a negative lipid interference test, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and aqua deficiency absence (Schirmer-1 test > 15 mm). The subgroup 1.1 (15 patients) received 0.18 % sodium hyaluronate (SH) instillations (Gilan comfort), while the other subgroup 1.2 received “fat-water” type emulsion instillations. Group 2 consisted of 30 moderate DES patients with lipid-aqua deficiency, who also had negative lipid interference test, MGD, and aqua deficiency presence. Subgroup 2.1 (15 patients) received 0.3 % sodium hyaluronate (SH) instillations (Gilan ultra comfort), while subgroup 2.2 patients received “fat-water” type emulsion instillations. We evaluated: the OSDI points, and tear break-up time (TBUT). Results. As a result of therapy, a positive effect of the therapy on OSDI and TBUT was observed in all subgroups. In group 1 , OSDI decrease and TBUT increase were more pronounced in subgroup 1.1 patients, however, this difference between subgroups was not statistically significant. In group 2, OSDI decrease and TBUT increase were more pronounced and statistically significant in subgroup 2.1 patients. Conclusion. In patients with mild DES and lipid deficiency, 0.18 % SH (Gilan comfort) demonstrated a positive effect on OSDI and TBUT comparable to the “fat-water” type emulsion. In moderate DES patients with lipid-aqua deficiency, 0.3 % SH (Gilan ultra comfort) demonstrated a statistically significant and more pronounced positive effect on OSDI and TBUT than the “fat-water” type emulsion.
干眼综合征及白内障患者泪液替代疗法的优化
目的:评价干眼综合征(DES)患者白内障超声乳化术(CPE)前泪液替代方法的有效性。材料和方法。60例DES和白内障患者在CPE前接受了术前治疗——泪液替代物滴注(每天4次,1个月)。他们被分为两组,每组又分为两个亚组。第1组包括30名患有脂质缺乏的轻度DES患者,他们的脂质干扰试验呈阴性,睑板腺功能障碍(MGD),水缺乏(Schirmer-1试验>15mm)。1.1亚组(15名患者)接受0.18%透明质酸钠(SH)滴注(吉兰舒适型),而1.2亚组接受“肥水”型乳液滴注。第2组由30名中度DES患者组成,他们患有脂质-水缺乏症,脂质干扰试验、MGD和水缺乏症也呈阴性。2.1亚组(15名患者)接受0.3%透明质酸钠(SH)滴注(吉兰超舒适型),2.2亚组患者接受“肥水”型乳液滴注。我们评估了:OSDI点和撕裂破裂时间(TBUT)。后果作为治疗的结果,在所有亚组中观察到该治疗对OSDI和TBUT的积极作用。在第1组中,1.1亚组患者的OSDI降低和TBUT增加更为明显,然而,亚组之间的这种差异没有统计学意义。在第2组中,2.1亚组患者的OSDI降低和TBUT增加更为明显,具有统计学意义。结论在轻度DES和脂质缺乏的患者中,0.18%SH(吉兰舒)对OSDI和TBUT的积极作用与“肥水”型乳液相当。在脂质水缺乏的中度DES患者中,0.3%SH(吉兰超舒适型)对OSDI和TBUT的积极作用比“脂肪水”型乳液更显著,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信