Outcomes of the use of the glycosaminoglycan-peptide complex as monotherapy and in combination with diacerein for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in real-world practice

A. Karateev, E. Polishchuk, A. Potapova, E. V. Matyanova, E. Filatova, S. Glukhova, A. Lila
{"title":"Outcomes of the use of the glycosaminoglycan-peptide complex as monotherapy and in combination with diacerein for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in real-world practice","authors":"A. Karateev, E. Polishchuk, A. Potapova, E. V. Matyanova, E. Filatova, S. Glukhova, A. Lila","doi":"10.26442/20751753.2023.2.202135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Slow-acting symptomatic agents (chondroprotectors) in osteoarthritis (OA) combined therapy is a promising approach. \nAim. To compare the real-world results of combined therapy with glycosaminoglycan-peptide complex (GPC) and diacerein with GPC monotherapy in treating knee OA. \nMaterials and methods. Statistical analysis of the data obtained during the observational, non-interventional study was conducted. The study group included 9190 patients with OA, 69.0% females, age 60.911.4, with moderate/severe pain (4 using a 010 numerical rating scale). Of these, 6199 received a combination of GPC (Rumalon, at least 20 intramuscular injections per course) + diacerein (Diaflex Rompharm) 100 mg/day, and 2991 patients received GPC monotherapy. The following indicators were evaluated: the change of pain during movement, at rest, and at night, the overall health assessment (using a 010 numerical rating scale), the number of patients with a pain reduction of 50% from the baseline, the patient's assessment of the treatment result using a 05 scale, a decrease in the need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 2 months after the start of therapy. \nResults. The improvement of clinical indicators was more significant in patients who received a combination of GPC + diacerein, compared with GPC monotherapy: the decrease in pain during movement was 3.11.5 and 2.61.3, at rest 1 [0; 2] and 1 [0; 1], at night 2 [1; 4] and 2 [1; 3], the overall health assessment was 3.71.7 and 3.21.8, respectively (for all indicators p0.001). The percentage of patients with a 50% reduction in pain was 66.0 and 60.0% (p0.001), the assessment of treatment results was \"good\" or \"excellent\" in 62.1 and 42.9% (p0.001), a decrease in the need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was reported in 60.9 and 57.1% (p=0.001) of patients, respectively. \nConclusion. The therapeutic effect of the combination of GPC + diacerein in patients with OA is significantly higher than that of GPC monotherapy.","PeriodicalId":10550,"journal":{"name":"Consilium Medicum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consilium Medicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.2.202135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Slow-acting symptomatic agents (chondroprotectors) in osteoarthritis (OA) combined therapy is a promising approach. Aim. To compare the real-world results of combined therapy with glycosaminoglycan-peptide complex (GPC) and diacerein with GPC monotherapy in treating knee OA. Materials and methods. Statistical analysis of the data obtained during the observational, non-interventional study was conducted. The study group included 9190 patients with OA, 69.0% females, age 60.911.4, with moderate/severe pain (4 using a 010 numerical rating scale). Of these, 6199 received a combination of GPC (Rumalon, at least 20 intramuscular injections per course) + diacerein (Diaflex Rompharm) 100 mg/day, and 2991 patients received GPC monotherapy. The following indicators were evaluated: the change of pain during movement, at rest, and at night, the overall health assessment (using a 010 numerical rating scale), the number of patients with a pain reduction of 50% from the baseline, the patient's assessment of the treatment result using a 05 scale, a decrease in the need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 2 months after the start of therapy. Results. The improvement of clinical indicators was more significant in patients who received a combination of GPC + diacerein, compared with GPC monotherapy: the decrease in pain during movement was 3.11.5 and 2.61.3, at rest 1 [0; 2] and 1 [0; 1], at night 2 [1; 4] and 2 [1; 3], the overall health assessment was 3.71.7 and 3.21.8, respectively (for all indicators p0.001). The percentage of patients with a 50% reduction in pain was 66.0 and 60.0% (p0.001), the assessment of treatment results was "good" or "excellent" in 62.1 and 42.9% (p0.001), a decrease in the need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was reported in 60.9 and 57.1% (p=0.001) of patients, respectively. Conclusion. The therapeutic effect of the combination of GPC + diacerein in patients with OA is significantly higher than that of GPC monotherapy.
糖胺聚糖肽复合物作为单一疗法和与二醋瑞因联合治疗膝骨关节炎的实际疗效
背景慢效症状药物(软骨保护剂)在骨关节炎(OA)联合治疗中是一种很有前途的方法。目标比较糖胺聚糖肽复合物(GPC)和二醋瑞因与GPC单药联合治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的实际结果。材料和方法。对观察性非介入性研究期间获得的数据进行了统计分析。研究组包括9190名OA患者,69.0%为女性,年龄60.911.4,伴有中度/重度疼痛(4名患者使用010数字评定量表)。其中,6199名患者接受了GPC(Rumalon,每疗程至少20次肌肉注射)+双醋瑞因(Diaflex Rompharm)100 mg/天的组合治疗,2991名患者接受GPC单药治疗。评估了以下指标:运动、休息和夜间疼痛的变化,整体健康评估(使用010数字评定量表),疼痛比基线减少50%的患者人数,患者对治疗结果的评估使用05量表,治疗开始后2个月对非甾体抗炎药的需求减少。后果与GPC单药治疗相比,接受GPC+二cerein联合治疗的患者的临床指标改善更为显著:运动过程中的疼痛减轻分别为3.11.5和2.61.3,休息时为1[0];2]和1[0];1],夜间为2[1;4]和2[1;3],总体健康评估分别为3.71.7和3.21.8,疼痛减轻50%的患者比例分别为66.0%和60.0%(p0.001),对治疗结果的评估为“良好”或“优秀”的患者比例为62.1%和42.9%(p0.001),对非甾体抗炎药的需求分别减少了60.9%和57.1%(p=0.001)。结论GPC+二cerein联合治疗OA患者的疗效显著高于GPC单药治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信