The Semantics of the Absurd: On German ‘Hermetic’ Poetry and Political Commitment after 1945

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
M. Pajević
{"title":"The Semantics of the Absurd: On German ‘Hermetic’ Poetry and Political Commitment after 1945","authors":"M. Pajević","doi":"10.12697/il.2023.28.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"German culture experienced an enormous rupture after 1945. Not only was the country in ruins and an outcast of the international community because of the recent regime and its devastating effects, its entire cultural tradition was under suspicion: had German culture always been steering towards this catastrophe? Was everything within it corrupt? While the frenetic economic activity of the ‘Wirtschaftswunder’ side-stepped a mainstream confrontation with the horrors of the recent past, intellectuals and artists radically interrogated the reasons for the disaster. As always, language and the meaning-making procedures in language prepare the mind to open up and to prepare for action. Language is at the root of action and this insight fuelled reflections on language, for instance by philosophers such as Wittgenstein and Heidegger. But it was particularly in lyric poetry that a lucid and politically aware examination of the recent past took place and an expression of such considerations could be found. \nThis paper demonstrates how poets made a unique and highly significant contribution to the development of a new political awareness in Germanlanguage culture. By integrating silence and the absurd (that is, the unheardof and the unspeakable) into literary language, this so-called hermetic poetry did not entail a withdrawal from society but, on the contrary, devoted itself to a particular form of political commitment. This procedure represents a rupture with what Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno called the ‘culture industry’ (1947), opposing conventional and habituated approaches to art in terms of its production and reception and advocating instead a stringent and critical concept of arresting aesthetic form that was to distinguish the work of art from products of that culture industry. Paul Celan, Ingeborg Bachmann, Ilse Aichinger, Günter Eich and Nelly Sachs are the household names associated with this poetics. While it was never necessarily mainstream, it was arguably the most innovative poetic strand of its time and in the long run a key factor in shaping a modern German culture that could come to terms with its past and overcome authoritarian structures.","PeriodicalId":41069,"journal":{"name":"Interlitteraria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interlitteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/il.2023.28.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

German culture experienced an enormous rupture after 1945. Not only was the country in ruins and an outcast of the international community because of the recent regime and its devastating effects, its entire cultural tradition was under suspicion: had German culture always been steering towards this catastrophe? Was everything within it corrupt? While the frenetic economic activity of the ‘Wirtschaftswunder’ side-stepped a mainstream confrontation with the horrors of the recent past, intellectuals and artists radically interrogated the reasons for the disaster. As always, language and the meaning-making procedures in language prepare the mind to open up and to prepare for action. Language is at the root of action and this insight fuelled reflections on language, for instance by philosophers such as Wittgenstein and Heidegger. But it was particularly in lyric poetry that a lucid and politically aware examination of the recent past took place and an expression of such considerations could be found. This paper demonstrates how poets made a unique and highly significant contribution to the development of a new political awareness in Germanlanguage culture. By integrating silence and the absurd (that is, the unheardof and the unspeakable) into literary language, this so-called hermetic poetry did not entail a withdrawal from society but, on the contrary, devoted itself to a particular form of political commitment. This procedure represents a rupture with what Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno called the ‘culture industry’ (1947), opposing conventional and habituated approaches to art in terms of its production and reception and advocating instead a stringent and critical concept of arresting aesthetic form that was to distinguish the work of art from products of that culture industry. Paul Celan, Ingeborg Bachmann, Ilse Aichinger, Günter Eich and Nelly Sachs are the household names associated with this poetics. While it was never necessarily mainstream, it was arguably the most innovative poetic strand of its time and in the long run a key factor in shaping a modern German culture that could come to terms with its past and overcome authoritarian structures.
荒诞的语义——论1945年后德国的“封闭”诗歌与政治承诺
1945年后,德国文化经历了巨大的断裂。这个国家不仅因为最近的政权及其破坏性影响而成为废墟,成为国际社会的弃儿,其整个文化传统也受到怀疑:德国文化一直在走向这场灾难吗?里面的一切都腐败了吗?当“Wirtschaftswunder”一方疯狂的经济活动与最近的恐怖事件形成主流对抗时,知识分子和艺术家们从根本上质疑了这场灾难的原因。和往常一样,语言和语言中的意义形成过程为思想的开放和行动做好了准备。语言是行动的根源,这种洞察力激发了对语言的思考,例如维特根斯坦和海德格尔等哲学家。但尤其是在抒情诗中,人们对最近的过去进行了清晰而有政治意识的审视,并表达了这种考虑。本文展示了诗人如何在德国语言文化中为新政治意识的发展做出了独特而重要的贡献。通过将沉默和荒谬(即不热情和无法言说)融入文学语言,这种所谓的封闭诗歌并没有意味着退出社会,相反,它致力于一种特定形式的政治承诺。这一过程代表着与马克斯·霍克海默和西奥多·W·阿多诺所称的“文化产业”(1947)的决裂,他们在艺术的生产和接受方面反对传统和习惯的艺术方法,而是提倡一种严格而批判性的美学形式概念,即将艺术作品与文化产业的产品区分开来。Paul Celan、Ingeborg Bachmann、Ilse Aichinger、Günter Eich和Nelly Sachs是与这一诗学相关的家喻户晓的人物。虽然它从来都不一定是主流,但它可以说是当时最具创新性的诗歌,从长远来看,它是塑造现代德国文化的关键因素,这种文化可以接受过去,克服专制结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interlitteraria
Interlitteraria LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信