Defining minimal invasive surgical therapy for benign prostatic obstruction surgery: Perspectives from a global knowledge, attitude, and practice survey

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Bryan Kwun-Chung Cheng , Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen , Daniele Castellani , Marcelo Langer Wroclawski , Hongda Zhao , Mallikarjuna Chiruvella , Wei-Jin Chua , Ho-Yee Tiong , Yiloren Tanidir , Jean de la Rosette , Enrique Rijo , Vincent Misrai , Amy Krambeck , Dean S. Elterman , Bhaskar K. Somani , Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh , Vineet Gauhar
{"title":"Defining minimal invasive surgical therapy for benign prostatic obstruction surgery: Perspectives from a global knowledge, attitude, and practice survey","authors":"Bryan Kwun-Chung Cheng ,&nbsp;Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen ,&nbsp;Daniele Castellani ,&nbsp;Marcelo Langer Wroclawski ,&nbsp;Hongda Zhao ,&nbsp;Mallikarjuna Chiruvella ,&nbsp;Wei-Jin Chua ,&nbsp;Ho-Yee Tiong ,&nbsp;Yiloren Tanidir ,&nbsp;Jean de la Rosette ,&nbsp;Enrique Rijo ,&nbsp;Vincent Misrai ,&nbsp;Amy Krambeck ,&nbsp;Dean S. Elterman ,&nbsp;Bhaskar K. Somani ,&nbsp;Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh ,&nbsp;Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To scrutinize the definitions of minimal invasive surgical therapy (MIST) and to investigate urologists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices for benign prostatic obstruction surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 36-item survey was developed with a Delphi method. Questions on definitions of MIST and attitudes and practices of benign prostatic obstruction surgeries were included. Urologists were invited globally to complete the online survey. Consensus was achieved when more than or equal to 70% responses were “agree or strongly agree” and less than or equal to 15% responses were “disagree or strongly disagree” (consensus agree), or when more than or equal to 70% responses were “disagree or strongly disagree” and less than or equal to 15% responses were “agree or strongly agree” (consensus disagree).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The top three qualities for defining MIST were minimal blood loss (<em>n</em>=466, 80.3%), fast post-operative recovery (<em>n</em>=431, 74.3%), and short hospital stay (<em>n</em>=425, 73.3%). The top three surgeries that were regarded as MIST were Urolift® (<em>n</em>=361, 62.2%), Rezum® (<em>n</em>=351, 60.5%), and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) (<em>n</em>=332, 57.2%). Consensus in the knowledge section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, day surgery feasibility, and post-operative continence. Consensus in the attitudes section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, and day surgery feasibility. Consensus on both sections was achieved for EEP as the option with the better symptoms and flow improvement, lower retreatment rate, and better suitable for prostate more than 80 mL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Minimal blood loss, fast post-operative recovery, and short hospital stay were the most important qualities for defining MIST. Urolift®, Rezum®, and EEP were regarded as MIST by most urologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221438822200090X/pdfft?md5=1d0370646ce1dbb1bc027110cb07a160&pid=1-s2.0-S221438822200090X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221438822200090X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To scrutinize the definitions of minimal invasive surgical therapy (MIST) and to investigate urologists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices for benign prostatic obstruction surgeries.

Methods

A 36-item survey was developed with a Delphi method. Questions on definitions of MIST and attitudes and practices of benign prostatic obstruction surgeries were included. Urologists were invited globally to complete the online survey. Consensus was achieved when more than or equal to 70% responses were “agree or strongly agree” and less than or equal to 15% responses were “disagree or strongly disagree” (consensus agree), or when more than or equal to 70% responses were “disagree or strongly disagree” and less than or equal to 15% responses were “agree or strongly agree” (consensus disagree).

Results

The top three qualities for defining MIST were minimal blood loss (n=466, 80.3%), fast post-operative recovery (n=431, 74.3%), and short hospital stay (n=425, 73.3%). The top three surgeries that were regarded as MIST were Urolift® (n=361, 62.2%), Rezum® (n=351, 60.5%), and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) (n=332, 57.2%). Consensus in the knowledge section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, day surgery feasibility, and post-operative continence. Consensus in the attitudes section was achieved for the superiority of Urolift®, Rezum®, and iTIND® over transurethral resection of the prostate with regard to blood loss, recovery, and day surgery feasibility. Consensus on both sections was achieved for EEP as the option with the better symptoms and flow improvement, lower retreatment rate, and better suitable for prostate more than 80 mL.

Conclusion

Minimal blood loss, fast post-operative recovery, and short hospital stay were the most important qualities for defining MIST. Urolift®, Rezum®, and EEP were regarded as MIST by most urologists.

定义良性前列腺梗阻手术的微创手术治疗:来自全球知识、态度和实践调查的视角
目的仔细研究微创手术疗法(MIST)的定义,并调查泌尿科医生对良性前列腺梗阻手术的认识、态度和做法。 方法采用德尔菲法编制了一份包含 36 个项目的调查问卷。其中包括有关 MIST 定义、良性前列腺梗阻手术的态度和实践的问题。邀请全球泌尿科医生完成在线调查。当超过或等于 70% 的回答为 "同意或非常同意",少于或等于 15% 的回答为 "不同意或非常不同意"(一致同意),或超过或等于 70% 的回答为 "不同意或非常不同意",少于或等于 15% 的回答为 "同意或非常同意"(一致不同意)时,即达成共识。结果 界定 MIST 的前三项标准是失血量少(466 人,占 80.3%)、术后恢复快(431 人,占 74.3%)和住院时间短(425 人,占 73.3%)。被视为 MIST 的前三位手术是 Urolift®(361 人,62.2%)、Rezum®(351 人,60.5%)和内窥镜前列腺去核术(EEP)(332 人,57.2%)。在知识部分,就失血量、恢复、日间手术可行性和术后尿失禁而言,Urolift®、Rezum® 和 iTIND® 优于经尿道前列腺切除术,这一点已达成共识。就失血量、恢复和日间手术可行性而言,Urolift®、Rezum® 和 iTIND® 优于经尿道前列腺切除术,这一点在态度部分已达成共识。两部分均一致认为 EEP 是症状和血流改善更好、再治疗率更低、更适合 80 毫升以上前列腺的方案。大多数泌尿科医生都将 Urolift®、Rezum® 和 EEP 视为 MIST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Urology
Asian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信