Metadata quality matters in open government data (OGD) evaluation! An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
A. P. Chokki, C. Alexopoulos, Stuti Saxena, Benoît Frénay, B. Vanderose, Mohsan Ali
{"title":"Metadata quality matters in open government data (OGD) evaluation! An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents","authors":"A. P. Chokki, C. Alexopoulos, Stuti Saxena, Benoît Frénay, B. Vanderose, Mohsan Ali","doi":"10.1108/tg-09-2022-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study seeks to investigate the quality of metadata associated with the open government data (OGD) portals of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) constituents – Bahrain (BH), Kuwait (KW), Oman (OM), Qatar (QA), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA quantitative framework, supported by extant literature, is adopted to assess the metadata quality of the six OGD portals of the GCC constituents.\n\n\nFindings\nAmong the six GCC countries, QA has the most advanced OGD metadata quality followed by KSA, UAE, OM, BH and KW. Furthermore, the OGD metadata quality (MQ) of UAE and OM stand at the same pedestal whereas BH and KW OGD portals are lagging behind.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile the OGD quality has been investigated in extant literature, the MQ of the OGD portals for the GCC countries has not been investigated so far – the present study seeks to plug this gap.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2022-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The study seeks to investigate the quality of metadata associated with the open government data (OGD) portals of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) constituents – Bahrain (BH), Kuwait (KW), Oman (OM), Qatar (QA), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE). Design/methodology/approach A quantitative framework, supported by extant literature, is adopted to assess the metadata quality of the six OGD portals of the GCC constituents. Findings Among the six GCC countries, QA has the most advanced OGD metadata quality followed by KSA, UAE, OM, BH and KW. Furthermore, the OGD metadata quality (MQ) of UAE and OM stand at the same pedestal whereas BH and KW OGD portals are lagging behind. Originality/value While the OGD quality has been investigated in extant literature, the MQ of the OGD portals for the GCC countries has not been investigated so far – the present study seeks to plug this gap.
开放政府数据(OGD)评估中的元数据质量问题!GCC成员的OGD门户的实证调查
目的本研究旨在调查与海湾合作委员会(GCC)六个成员国——巴林(BH)、科威特(KW)、阿曼(OM)、卡塔尔(QA)、沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)和阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)——的开放政府数据(OGD)门户网站相关的元数据的质量,用于评估GCC组成部分的六个OGD门户的元数据质量。发现在海湾合作委员会的六个国家中,QA拥有最先进的OGD元数据质量,其次是KSA、UAE、OM、BH和KW。此外,UAE和OM的OGD元数据质量(MQ)处于同一水平,而BH和KW的OGD门户则落后。原创性/价值虽然现有文献中对OGD质量进行了调查,但迄今为止尚未对海湾合作委员会国家的OGD门户网站的MQ进行调查——本研究旨在填补这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信