VOTING BEHAVIOR RESPONSES TO WOM (WORD-OF-MOUTH) AND EWOM (ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH) INFORMATION

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Zen-U Hotta, Masato Eguchi
{"title":"VOTING BEHAVIOR RESPONSES TO WOM (WORD-OF-MOUTH) AND EWOM (ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH) INFORMATION","authors":"Zen-U Hotta, Masato Eguchi","doi":"10.22353/ps.v17i505.2512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making is often influenced by external information, especially opinions of others.Though past studies revealed that both WOM (word-of-mouth) and EWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) information influences on decision making, little has been investigated and found out in the field of voting behavior, with the possible exception of the fact that several categories of WOM factors influence on voting. As voters face multiple WOM and EWOM information concerning various characteristics of political candidates in real life, it is important to know how they prioritize some information over others. On such backdrop, this study attempts to see how much weight voters would put on 640 types of information – positive and negative information on 16 types of candidate characteristics coming from 20 different WOM and EWOM sources. Two facts have come out. One is that voters prioritize positive information over negative information of the same candidate characteristic, with the exceptions of relationship with family members, campaign activity, and news/scandal of candidate.Another is that voters prioritize WOM information over EWOM information on the same candidate characteristic, regardless of whether the information is positive or negative, for all characteristics.","PeriodicalId":51379,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22353/ps.v17i505.2512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision making is often influenced by external information, especially opinions of others.Though past studies revealed that both WOM (word-of-mouth) and EWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) information influences on decision making, little has been investigated and found out in the field of voting behavior, with the possible exception of the fact that several categories of WOM factors influence on voting. As voters face multiple WOM and EWOM information concerning various characteristics of political candidates in real life, it is important to know how they prioritize some information over others. On such backdrop, this study attempts to see how much weight voters would put on 640 types of information – positive and negative information on 16 types of candidate characteristics coming from 20 different WOM and EWOM sources. Two facts have come out. One is that voters prioritize positive information over negative information of the same candidate characteristic, with the exceptions of relationship with family members, campaign activity, and news/scandal of candidate.Another is that voters prioritize WOM information over EWOM information on the same candidate characteristic, regardless of whether the information is positive or negative, for all characteristics.
对口碑和电子口碑信息的投票行为反应
决策往往受到外部信息的影响,尤其是他人的意见。尽管过去的研究表明口碑(口碑)和电子口碑(EWOM)信息都会影响决策,但在投票行为领域,除了几类口碑因素会影响投票这一事实之外,很少有人进行调查和发现。由于选民在现实生活中面临着与政治候选人的各种特征有关的多个WOM和EWOM信息,因此了解他们如何将某些信息优先于其他信息是很重要的。在这种背景下,本研究试图了解选民对640种信息的重视程度——来自20种不同的口碑和EWOM来源的16种候选人特征的正面和负面信息。有两个事实已经水落石出。一种是,选民优先考虑具有相同候选人特征的正面信息,而不是负面信息,但与家人的关系、竞选活动和候选人的新闻/丑闻除外。另一个是,对于所有特征,选民在同一候选人特征上优先考虑口碑信息,而不是EWOM信息,无论信息是正面的还是负面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Studies
Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Political Studies is a leading international journal committed to the very highest standards of peer review that publishes academically rigorous and original work in all fields of politics and international relations. The editors encourage a pluralistic approach to political science and debate across the discipline. Political Studies aims to develop the most promising new work available and to facilitate professional communication in political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信