The Chironomus species studied by Letha Karunakaran in Singapore, with a review of the status of selected South-East Asian Chironomus

John Martin
{"title":"The Chironomus species studied by Letha Karunakaran in Singapore, with a review of the status of selected South-East Asian Chironomus","authors":"John Martin","doi":"10.5324/cjcr.v0i35.4833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1960s Letha Karunakaran studied the chironomid fauna of Singapore but  faced a lack of sufficiently detailed descriptions to enable identification of her material with any certainty.  She recognized seven species of Chironomus (s.s) but sent me fixed larval material of only four of these which she tentatively identified as C. apicatus Johannsen 1932, C. costatus Johannsen 1932, C. javanus Kieffer 1924, and C. stupidus Johannsen 1932. She sent fixed larvae to me for confirmation of her identifications, but died before I was able to determine accurate identities from morphology alone. With additional comparative material, along with polytene chromosome banding patterns and DNA barcode sequence from the mitochondrial COI gene, the species have been identified as a form of C. flaviplumus (auct, not Tokunaga)(here called C. flaviplumus Type B),  C. circumdatus Kieffer 1916, probably C. striatipennis Kieffer 1910,  and Kiefferulus barbatitarsis (Kieffer 1911), respectively. The identification of one species as a form of C. flaviplumus required an assessment of the present state of knowledge of this species where the name has been applied to at least five different species. Determination of a valid name for this species is not currently possible. The confusion of species identification is an indication that there are a number of closely related species which constitute a “C. flaviplumus group”.","PeriodicalId":30852,"journal":{"name":"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/cjcr.v0i35.4833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1960s Letha Karunakaran studied the chironomid fauna of Singapore but  faced a lack of sufficiently detailed descriptions to enable identification of her material with any certainty.  She recognized seven species of Chironomus (s.s) but sent me fixed larval material of only four of these which she tentatively identified as C. apicatus Johannsen 1932, C. costatus Johannsen 1932, C. javanus Kieffer 1924, and C. stupidus Johannsen 1932. She sent fixed larvae to me for confirmation of her identifications, but died before I was able to determine accurate identities from morphology alone. With additional comparative material, along with polytene chromosome banding patterns and DNA barcode sequence from the mitochondrial COI gene, the species have been identified as a form of C. flaviplumus (auct, not Tokunaga)(here called C. flaviplumus Type B),  C. circumdatus Kieffer 1916, probably C. striatipennis Kieffer 1910,  and Kiefferulus barbatitarsis (Kieffer 1911), respectively. The identification of one species as a form of C. flaviplumus required an assessment of the present state of knowledge of this species where the name has been applied to at least five different species. Determination of a valid name for this species is not currently possible. The confusion of species identification is an indication that there are a number of closely related species which constitute a “C. flaviplumus group”.
Letha Karunakaran在新加坡研究的摇蚊物种,以及东南亚摇蚊的现状综述
20世纪60年代,Letha Karunakaran研究了新加坡的指压动物群,但缺乏足够详细的描述,无法确定她的材料。她认出了七种摇蚊,但只给我寄来了其中四种的固定幼虫材料,她初步确定它们分别是1932年的C.apicatus Johannsen、1932年的C.costatus Johannen、1924年的C.javanus Kieffer和1932年的C.stubidus Johannsen。她把固定的幼虫送到我这里确认她的身份,但在我仅从形态学就能确定准确身份之前就死了。有了额外的比较材料,再加上线粒体COI基因的多线染色体带型和DNA条形码序列,该物种已分别被鉴定为C.flavipilumus(auct,而不是Tokunaga)(这里称为C.flawipilumus Type B)、C.circodatus Kieffer 1916、C.striatipennis Kieffer 1910和Kieffulus barbattarsis(Kieffer 1911)的一种形式。要将一个物种鉴定为C.flaviplumus的一种形式,需要对该物种的现有知识状况进行评估,其中该名称已应用于至少五个不同的物种。目前还无法确定该物种的有效名称。物种鉴定的混乱表明,有许多亲缘关系密切的物种组成了“黄颡鱼群”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信