Financialisation and Macroeconomic Regimes in Emerging Capitalist Countries Before and After the Great Recession

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Ümit Akçay, Eckhard Hein, Benjamin Jungmann
{"title":"Financialisation and Macroeconomic Regimes in Emerging Capitalist Countries Before and After the Great Recession","authors":"Ümit Akçay, Eckhard Hein, Benjamin Jungmann","doi":"10.1080/08911916.2022.2078009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, diverging demand and growth regimes received greater scholarly attention. Particularly, the intersection between variants of Comparative Political Economy and the post-Keynesian macroeconomic analysis provides a promising avenue for understanding the main dynamics of various growth regimes. Yet, the majority of these studies focused on the global North. We expand this analysis to the global South by examining eight large emerging capitalist economies (ECEs), Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, and Turkey, during the periods 2000–2008 and 2009–2019. In so doing, we not only uncover the main demand and growth regimes of ECEs for the two periods but also link them to the main trends in the demand and growth regimes of developed capitalist economies (DCEs) for both periods. One main finding of our research is that ECEs did not follow the same path as DCEs after the Great Recession. While there was a clear shift in the demand and growth regimes of DCEs toward export orientation, the main pattern in the ECEs remained as the continuation of a trend that already emerged before the 2007–09 crisis, i.e., domestic demand-led regimes associated with considerable financial deficits of domestic private and/or public sectors. Finally, we provide some observations on the puzzle of resilient domestic demand-led regimes in ECEs.","PeriodicalId":44784,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2022.2078009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, diverging demand and growth regimes received greater scholarly attention. Particularly, the intersection between variants of Comparative Political Economy and the post-Keynesian macroeconomic analysis provides a promising avenue for understanding the main dynamics of various growth regimes. Yet, the majority of these studies focused on the global North. We expand this analysis to the global South by examining eight large emerging capitalist economies (ECEs), Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, and Turkey, during the periods 2000–2008 and 2009–2019. In so doing, we not only uncover the main demand and growth regimes of ECEs for the two periods but also link them to the main trends in the demand and growth regimes of developed capitalist economies (DCEs) for both periods. One main finding of our research is that ECEs did not follow the same path as DCEs after the Great Recession. While there was a clear shift in the demand and growth regimes of DCEs toward export orientation, the main pattern in the ECEs remained as the continuation of a trend that already emerged before the 2007–09 crisis, i.e., domestic demand-led regimes associated with considerable financial deficits of domestic private and/or public sectors. Finally, we provide some observations on the puzzle of resilient domestic demand-led regimes in ECEs.
大衰退前后新兴资本主义国家的金融化与宏观经济制度
摘要近年来,不同的需求和增长机制受到了越来越多的学术关注。特别是,比较政治经济学变体和后凯恩斯主义宏观经济分析之间的交叉为理解各种增长机制的主要动态提供了一条很有前途的途径。然而,这些研究大多集中在全球北方。我们通过考察2000-2008年和2009-2019年期间的八个大型新兴资本主义经济体,阿根廷、巴西、中国、印度、墨西哥、俄罗斯、南非和土耳其,将这一分析扩展到全球南方。在这样做的过程中,我们不仅揭示了这两个时期ECE的主要需求和增长机制,而且将它们与这两个阶段发达资本主义经济体需求和增长体制的主要趋势联系起来。我们研究的一个主要发现是,经济衰退后,欧洲经济共同体并没有走上与欧洲经济共同体相同的道路。尽管DCE的需求和增长机制明显转向出口导向,但ECE的主要模式仍然是2007-2009年危机前已经出现的趋势的延续,即与国内私营和/或公共部门的巨额财政赤字相关的内需主导机制。最后,我们对欧洲经济共同体中弹性内需主导机制的困惑进行了一些观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信