Trying to Express Climate Concerns through Environmental Law? The Changing Lawscape of Public Participation

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
B. Richardson, Sarah Castles-Lynch
{"title":"Trying to Express Climate Concerns through Environmental Law? The Changing Lawscape of Public Participation","authors":"B. Richardson, Sarah Castles-Lynch","doi":"10.1163/18786561-bja10037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe ‘lawscape’ (landscape) of public participation in environmental decision-making in Australia is evolving as climate change has become society’s dominant environmental concern. The traditional modes for citizens to express their concerns through administrative and legislative processes are losing their legitimacy and efficacy. The growth of civil disobedience by climate protesters is a response to this deficit. Rather than viewing such dissent as purely a phenomenon ‘outside’ the legal system, in defiance of the law, climate protest can also plausibly be understood as a shift in the mode of public participation within the legal system as discussions about climate science and action extend to new forums, especially courtrooms hearing criminal prosecutions against climate activists.","PeriodicalId":38485,"journal":{"name":"Climate Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-bja10037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘lawscape’ (landscape) of public participation in environmental decision-making in Australia is evolving as climate change has become society’s dominant environmental concern. The traditional modes for citizens to express their concerns through administrative and legislative processes are losing their legitimacy and efficacy. The growth of civil disobedience by climate protesters is a response to this deficit. Rather than viewing such dissent as purely a phenomenon ‘outside’ the legal system, in defiance of the law, climate protest can also plausibly be understood as a shift in the mode of public participation within the legal system as discussions about climate science and action extend to new forums, especially courtrooms hearing criminal prosecutions against climate activists.
试图通过环境法表达对气候的关注?变化中的公众参与格局
随着气候变化成为社会主要的环境问题,澳大利亚公众参与环境决策的“法律景观”(景观)正在演变。公民通过行政和立法程序表达关切的传统模式正在失去其合法性和有效性。气候抗议者的公民抗命行为的增加就是对这种赤字的回应。气候抗议不是将这种异议视为纯粹的“法律体系之外”的现象,而是无视法律,而是可以合理地理解为法律体系内公众参与模式的转变,因为关于气候科学和行动的讨论扩展到了新的论坛,特别是审理对气候活动家的刑事起诉的法庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climate Law
Climate Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信