Point Cloud Data from Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Aerial LiDAR Data: Estimations of Forest Stand Parameters in Open Forest Stand

Q3 Engineering
A. E. Arslan, M. Inan, M. F. Celik, E. Erten
{"title":"Point Cloud Data from Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Aerial LiDAR Data: Estimations of Forest Stand Parameters in Open Forest Stand","authors":"A. E. Arslan, M. Inan, M. F. Celik, E. Erten","doi":"10.33904/ejfe.1174123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two of the very basic forestry parameters, the Breast Height Diameter (DBH) and Tree Height (TH) are very effective when characterizing forest stands and individual trees. The traditional measurement process of these parameters takes a lot of time and consumes human power. However, because of the development of PC power and digital storage in recent years, 3D Point Cloud (PC) gains quickly provide a very detailed view of forestry parameters. PC data sources include Airborne LiDAR Systems (ALS), Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and finally, the Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) for forestry applications. In this study, the PC datasets from these sources were used to study the feasibility of the DBH and TH values of a D-stage oak stand. The DBH and TH estimates are compared with the onsite measurements, which are considered to be fundamental truths, to their performance due to overall error statistics, as well as the cost of calculation and the difficulties in data collection. The results show that the computer data obtained by TLS has the best average square error (0.22 cm for DBH and 0,051 m for TH) compared to other computer data. The size of Pearson correlation between TLS-based and on-site-based measurements has reached 0.97 and 0.99 for DBH, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36173,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1174123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two of the very basic forestry parameters, the Breast Height Diameter (DBH) and Tree Height (TH) are very effective when characterizing forest stands and individual trees. The traditional measurement process of these parameters takes a lot of time and consumes human power. However, because of the development of PC power and digital storage in recent years, 3D Point Cloud (PC) gains quickly provide a very detailed view of forestry parameters. PC data sources include Airborne LiDAR Systems (ALS), Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and finally, the Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) for forestry applications. In this study, the PC datasets from these sources were used to study the feasibility of the DBH and TH values of a D-stage oak stand. The DBH and TH estimates are compared with the onsite measurements, which are considered to be fundamental truths, to their performance due to overall error statistics, as well as the cost of calculation and the difficulties in data collection. The results show that the computer data obtained by TLS has the best average square error (0.22 cm for DBH and 0,051 m for TH) compared to other computer data. The size of Pearson correlation between TLS-based and on-site-based measurements has reached 0.97 and 0.99 for DBH, respectively.
地面激光扫描、无人机和航空激光雷达数据的点云数据:开放林分中林分参数的估计
两个非常基本的林业参数,即树干高度直径(DBH)和树木高度(TH),在表征林分和单株时非常有效。这些参数的传统测量过程需要大量的时间并且消耗人力。然而,由于近年来PC电源和数字存储的发展,3D点云(PC)的收益迅速提供了林业参数的非常详细的视图。PC数据源包括机载激光雷达系统(ALS)、地面激光扫描(TLS),以及用于林业应用的无人飞行器(UAV)。在本研究中,使用来自这些来源的PC数据集来研究D期橡树林的DBH和TH值的可行性。将DBH和TH估计值与现场测量值进行比较,这些测量值被认为是基本事实,以及由于总体误差统计、计算成本和数据收集困难而导致的性能。结果表明,与其他计算机数据相比,TLS获得的计算机数据具有最佳的均方误差(DBH为0.22cm,TH为0051m)。DBH的基于TLS和基于现场的测量之间的Pearson相关性大小分别达到0.97和0.99。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Forest Engineering
European Journal of Forest Engineering Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信