Evaluation of the analgesic effect of oral sucrose solution on neonates undergoing a minor painful procedure

Kallol Paul, P. Halder, Rituparna Das, Arpita Choudhury, Prerna Goenka, Sourav Roy
{"title":"Evaluation of the analgesic effect of oral sucrose solution on neonates undergoing a minor painful procedure","authors":"Kallol Paul, P. Halder, Rituparna Das, Arpita Choudhury, Prerna Goenka, Sourav Roy","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_14_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pacifying newborns by nonpharmacological methods during painful procedures is a frequent and difficult problem in routine practice. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the analgesic effects of oral sucrose solution in comparison to placebo (sterile water) in neonates. Materials and Methods: A prospective, double-blinded study of 100 neonates who were divided into two groups after simple randomization, to give either 30% sucrose solution (group A) or sterile water (group B) during an intravenous catheterization. Assessment of pain by the Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne scale (DAN) and changes in the heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), or arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) during peripheral vein catheterization were analyzed. Results: The mean change of HR, RR, and SpO2 was more in group B compared to group A. The mean DAN scores were 2.24 ± 2.026 and 6.92 ± 2.538 in group A and group B, respectively. None of these results were statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There was a less prominent change in HR, RR, and SpO2 with response to noxious stimuli with oral sucrose administration in newborns when compared to placebo.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"258 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_14_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pacifying newborns by nonpharmacological methods during painful procedures is a frequent and difficult problem in routine practice. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the analgesic effects of oral sucrose solution in comparison to placebo (sterile water) in neonates. Materials and Methods: A prospective, double-blinded study of 100 neonates who were divided into two groups after simple randomization, to give either 30% sucrose solution (group A) or sterile water (group B) during an intravenous catheterization. Assessment of pain by the Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne scale (DAN) and changes in the heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), or arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) during peripheral vein catheterization were analyzed. Results: The mean change of HR, RR, and SpO2 was more in group B compared to group A. The mean DAN scores were 2.24 ± 2.026 and 6.92 ± 2.538 in group A and group B, respectively. None of these results were statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There was a less prominent change in HR, RR, and SpO2 with response to noxious stimuli with oral sucrose administration in newborns when compared to placebo.
口服蔗糖溶液对新生儿轻微疼痛手术的镇痛效果评价
背景:在常规操作中,用非药物方法对新生儿进行安抚是一个常见而困难的问题。目的:本研究的目的是确定口服蔗糖溶液与安慰剂(无菌水)对新生儿的镇痛作用。材料和方法:对100名新生儿进行前瞻性双盲研究,这些新生儿在简单随机化后分为两组,在静脉插管期间给予30%蔗糖溶液(A组)或无菌水(B组)。分析了Douler-Aigue新运动量表(DAN)对疼痛的评估以及外周静脉置管期间心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)或动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化。结果:与A组相比,B组的HR、RR和SpO2的平均变化更大。A组和B组的平均DAN得分分别为2.24±2.026和6.92±2.538。这些结果均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与安慰剂相比,新生儿口服蔗糖对有害刺激的反应在HR、RR和SpO2方面的变化不那么显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信