Extended Collective Licensing and Archives

Q3 Social Sciences

Journal of Archival Organization Pub Date : 2017-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15332748.2018.1503015

Jean E. Dryden

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract While extended collective licensing (ECL) is seen by many to be the solution to the use of copyright-protected works in the digital environment, this column critically examines the extent to which ECL applies to the holdings of archival institutions, and concludes that archival holdings and ECL are not a good match.

查看原文本刊更多论文

扩展集体许可和档案

摘要虽然扩展集体许可（ECL）被许多人视为在数字环境中使用版权保护作品的解决方案，但本专栏批判性地研究了ECL在多大程度上适用于档案机构的持有，并得出结论，档案持有和ECL并不匹配。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Archival Organization Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Archival Organization is an international journal encompassing all aspects of the arrangement, description, and provision of access to all forms of archival materials. Articles on processing techniques and procedures, preparation of finding aids, and cataloging of archival and manuscript collections in accordance with MARC, AACR2, and other rules, standards, and cataloging conventions are only part of what you"ll find in this refereed/peer-reviewed publication. The journal places emphasis on emerging technologies, applications, and standards that range from Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and methods of organizing archival collections for access on the World Wide Web to issues connected with the digitization and display of archival materials.