Assessing Wild Pollinators in Conventional Agriculture: A Case Study From Maine’s Blueberry Industry

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Samuel P. Hanes, Kourtney K. Collum, F. Drummond, A. K. Hoshide
{"title":"Assessing Wild Pollinators in Conventional Agriculture: A Case Study From Maine’s Blueberry Industry","authors":"Samuel P. Hanes, Kourtney K. Collum, F. Drummond, A. K. Hoshide","doi":"10.22459/HER.24.01.2018.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing use of functional agrobiodiversity, organisms that help farmers, is crucial to improving resilience of conventional agriculture in industrial countries. Literature suggests acquiring local ecological knowledge on these species is a formidable barrier. The present study uses interview data to explore farmers’ acquisition of local ecological knowledge concerning wild bees, as well as farmers’ use and conservation of wild bees. Wild bees are important crop pollinators and an alternative or supplement to declining commercial honeybees. We found that high uncertainty over wild bees prompts risk aversion, slowing use and conservation. However, to acquire local ecological knowledge, farmers eschew time-consuming assessment and instead develop rules of thumb that mesh with and draw on their use of honeybees. These findings illustrate the complex way in which farmers adapt to the challenge of acquiring local ecological knowledge of functional agrobiodiversity in a conventional agricultural system.","PeriodicalId":46896,"journal":{"name":"Human Ecology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Ecology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.24.01.2018.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Increasing use of functional agrobiodiversity, organisms that help farmers, is crucial to improving resilience of conventional agriculture in industrial countries. Literature suggests acquiring local ecological knowledge on these species is a formidable barrier. The present study uses interview data to explore farmers’ acquisition of local ecological knowledge concerning wild bees, as well as farmers’ use and conservation of wild bees. Wild bees are important crop pollinators and an alternative or supplement to declining commercial honeybees. We found that high uncertainty over wild bees prompts risk aversion, slowing use and conservation. However, to acquire local ecological knowledge, farmers eschew time-consuming assessment and instead develop rules of thumb that mesh with and draw on their use of honeybees. These findings illustrate the complex way in which farmers adapt to the challenge of acquiring local ecological knowledge of functional agrobiodiversity in a conventional agricultural system.
评估传统农业中的野生传粉昆虫:以缅因州蓝莓产业为例
更多地利用功能性农业生物多样性,即帮助农民的生物,对于提高工业化国家传统农业的复原力至关重要。文献表明,获取有关这些物种的当地生态知识是一个巨大的障碍。本研究使用访谈数据来探索农民对当地野生蜜蜂生态知识的获取,以及农民对野生蜜蜂的使用和保护。野生蜜蜂是重要的作物传粉昆虫,也是日益减少的商业蜜蜂的替代品或补充品。我们发现,野生蜜蜂的高度不确定性会引发风险规避,减缓使用和保护。然而,为了获得当地的生态知识,农民们避免了耗时的评估,而是制定了与蜜蜂的使用相吻合并借鉴的经验法则。这些发现说明了农民在传统农业系统中适应获取当地功能性农业生物多样性生态知识的挑战的复杂方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Human Ecology Review (ISSN 1074-4827) is a refereed journal published twice a year by the Society for Human Ecology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed research and theory on the interaction between humans and the environment and other links between culture and nature (Research in Human Ecology), essays and applications relevant to human ecology (Human Ecology Forum), book reviews (Contemporary Human Ecology), and relevant commentary, announcements, and awards (Human Ecology Bulletin).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信