EVALUATING PUBLIC URBAN GREEN SPACES: A COMPOSITE GREEN SPACE INDEX FOR MEASURING ACCESSIBILITY AND SPATIAL QUALITY

Q2 Social Sciences
B. Ghale, K. Gupta, A. Roy
{"title":"EVALUATING PUBLIC URBAN GREEN SPACES: A COMPOSITE GREEN SPACE INDEX FOR MEASURING ACCESSIBILITY AND SPATIAL QUALITY","authors":"B. Ghale, K. Gupta, A. Roy","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-3-2023-101-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Greenspaces (GSs) available to the public for recreational, environmental, and aesthetic purposes are termed Public Urban Green Spaces (PUGS). Accessibility to PUGS is one of the main pre-requisite for their frequent use. With rising urbanization and inequitable distribution of GSs, a significant portion of the population remains inaccessible to the benefits provided by PUGS. Therefore, it is essential to have tools to evaluate these GSs. This study evaluates the accessibility and spatial quality of various hierarchies of PUGS using GIS-based analysis in Dehradun, India. Accessibility is assessed using network analysis, aesthetics is determined by the presence of bird population and waterbody, the surface index is determined based on NDVI thresholding, and affordability, and spaciousness are computed based on survey and GIS data. The indices are combined to form a composite green space index (CGSI) using analytical hierarchy process. CGSI shows that most of the PUGS in Dehradun have relatively poor accessibility and quality. As per World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for providing a minimum of 9m2 of GS for each person, Dehradun lies way behind, providing 2.02m2/person. The lower hierarchy PUGS, notably totlots, which are crucial for young children’s physical, mental, and cognitive development, is quite limited. On the contrary, city parks are well distributed with moderate to good accessibility and quality. CGSI is a comprehensive index encompassing different characteristics of GSs and serves as a valuable tool for setting goals, prioritizing investments, identifying areas in need of improvement, and potential locations for future GS development.\n","PeriodicalId":30634,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-3-2023-101-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Greenspaces (GSs) available to the public for recreational, environmental, and aesthetic purposes are termed Public Urban Green Spaces (PUGS). Accessibility to PUGS is one of the main pre-requisite for their frequent use. With rising urbanization and inequitable distribution of GSs, a significant portion of the population remains inaccessible to the benefits provided by PUGS. Therefore, it is essential to have tools to evaluate these GSs. This study evaluates the accessibility and spatial quality of various hierarchies of PUGS using GIS-based analysis in Dehradun, India. Accessibility is assessed using network analysis, aesthetics is determined by the presence of bird population and waterbody, the surface index is determined based on NDVI thresholding, and affordability, and spaciousness are computed based on survey and GIS data. The indices are combined to form a composite green space index (CGSI) using analytical hierarchy process. CGSI shows that most of the PUGS in Dehradun have relatively poor accessibility and quality. As per World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for providing a minimum of 9m2 of GS for each person, Dehradun lies way behind, providing 2.02m2/person. The lower hierarchy PUGS, notably totlots, which are crucial for young children’s physical, mental, and cognitive development, is quite limited. On the contrary, city parks are well distributed with moderate to good accessibility and quality. CGSI is a comprehensive index encompassing different characteristics of GSs and serves as a valuable tool for setting goals, prioritizing investments, identifying areas in need of improvement, and potential locations for future GS development.
城市公共绿地评价:一个衡量可达性和空间质量的复合绿地指标
摘要公众可用于娱乐、环境和美学目的的绿地(GS)被称为公共城市绿地(PUGS)。PUGS的可访问性是其频繁使用的主要先决条件之一。随着城市化程度的提高和GS分配的不公平,很大一部分人口仍然无法获得PUGS提供的福利。因此,拥有评估这些GS的工具是至关重要的。本研究采用基于GIS的分析方法,对印度德拉敦PUGS不同层次的可达性和空间质量进行了评估。使用网络分析评估可达性,美学由鸟类种群和水体的存在决定,表面指数基于NDVI阈值确定,可负担性和空间度基于调查和GIS数据计算。利用层次分析法将这些指标组合起来形成一个综合绿地指数(CGSI)。CGSI显示,德拉敦的大多数PUGS的可及性和质量相对较差。根据世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)为每个人提供至少9平方米GS的指导方针,Dehradun远远落后,提供了2.02平方米GS。较低层次的PUGS,尤其是对幼儿的身体、心理和认知发展至关重要的小批量PUGS,非常有限。相反,城市公园分布良好,可达性和质量适中。CGSI是一个综合指数,涵盖了GS的不同特征,是制定目标、确定投资优先级、确定需要改进的领域以及未来GS发展的潜在地点的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
949
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信