Does Footwear Influence Countermovement Jump Parameters Used to Assess Performance in Collegiate Basketball Players?

Q3 Health Professions
Aaron D Heishman, Keldon M. Peak, Bryce D. Daub, Ryan M. Miller, Eduardo D S Freitas
{"title":"Does Footwear Influence Countermovement Jump Parameters Used to Assess Performance in Collegiate Basketball Players?","authors":"Aaron D Heishman, Keldon M. Peak, Bryce D. Daub, Ryan M. Miller, Eduardo D S Freitas","doi":"10.7575/AIAC.IJKSS.V.9N.2P.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The countermovement jump (CMJ) is used to monitor short- and long-term changes in neuromuscular performance, where practically relevant alteration may be subtle, requiring detailed and consistent testing protocols to limit error and allow detection of meaningful change. Collegiate basketball players often wear different types of footwear depending upon the training activity, potentially influencing CMJ performance outcomes. Objective: This study evaluated the influence of footwear on key CMJ variables used for routine performance assessments in a cohort of 11 NCAA women’s collegiate basketball players. Method: In a cross-over repeated measures study design, players performed three CMJs in Basketball-, Training-(Trainers), and Olympic Weightlifting (WL) shoes, in a randomized order during one testing session. One-way repeated measures analyses of variance (p ≤ .05) and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were used to discern differences in CMJ variables among shoe conditions. Results: WL demonstrated greater Eccentric Mean Force (p ≤ .014, d ≥ 0.03) and lower Flight Time:Contraction Time (p ≤ .029, d ≥ 0.31), Jump Height (p ≤ .040, d ≥ 0.32), and Reactive Strength Index-Modified (p ≤ .032, d ≥ 0.40) than both Basketball and Trainers. Additionally, WL exhibited lower Concentric Mean Force (p = .018, d = 0.19), Concentric Mean Power (p = .008, d = 0.29), Eccentric Peak Force (p = .050, d = 0.19), and Flight Time (p = .036, d = 0.31) compared to Trainer. No significant differences and only trivial effects appeared between Basketball and Trainers (p > 0.05, d < 0.1). Conclusion: These findings suggest footwear significantly influences CMJ performance. WL shoes appear to negatively impact CMJ performance; however, Basketball and Trainers appear to exert negligible effects that should allow clinicians and practitioners to feel confident about measurement and data quality when performing short- and long-term CMJ measurements in either Basketball or Trainers.","PeriodicalId":36327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJKSS.V.9N.2P.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The countermovement jump (CMJ) is used to monitor short- and long-term changes in neuromuscular performance, where practically relevant alteration may be subtle, requiring detailed and consistent testing protocols to limit error and allow detection of meaningful change. Collegiate basketball players often wear different types of footwear depending upon the training activity, potentially influencing CMJ performance outcomes. Objective: This study evaluated the influence of footwear on key CMJ variables used for routine performance assessments in a cohort of 11 NCAA women’s collegiate basketball players. Method: In a cross-over repeated measures study design, players performed three CMJs in Basketball-, Training-(Trainers), and Olympic Weightlifting (WL) shoes, in a randomized order during one testing session. One-way repeated measures analyses of variance (p ≤ .05) and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were used to discern differences in CMJ variables among shoe conditions. Results: WL demonstrated greater Eccentric Mean Force (p ≤ .014, d ≥ 0.03) and lower Flight Time:Contraction Time (p ≤ .029, d ≥ 0.31), Jump Height (p ≤ .040, d ≥ 0.32), and Reactive Strength Index-Modified (p ≤ .032, d ≥ 0.40) than both Basketball and Trainers. Additionally, WL exhibited lower Concentric Mean Force (p = .018, d = 0.19), Concentric Mean Power (p = .008, d = 0.29), Eccentric Peak Force (p = .050, d = 0.19), and Flight Time (p = .036, d = 0.31) compared to Trainer. No significant differences and only trivial effects appeared between Basketball and Trainers (p > 0.05, d < 0.1). Conclusion: These findings suggest footwear significantly influences CMJ performance. WL shoes appear to negatively impact CMJ performance; however, Basketball and Trainers appear to exert negligible effects that should allow clinicians and practitioners to feel confident about measurement and data quality when performing short- and long-term CMJ measurements in either Basketball or Trainers.
鞋类是否影响用于评估大学生篮球运动员表现的反动作跳跃参数?
背景:反动作跳跃(CMJ)用于监测神经肌肉性能的短期和长期变化,其中实际相关的变化可能很微妙,需要详细和一致的测试方案来限制误差并允许检测有意义的变化。大学篮球运动员经常根据训练活动穿着不同类型的鞋,这可能会影响CMJ的表现。目的:本研究评估了鞋类对11名NCAA女子大学篮球运动员日常表现评估中使用的关键CMJ变量的影响。方法:在交叉重复测量研究设计中,球员在一次测试中,按照随机顺序,在篮球鞋、训练鞋和奥运举重鞋上进行了三次CMJ。方差(p≤.05)和效应大小(Cohen’s d)的单向重复测量分析用于辨别不同鞋况下CMJ变量的差异。结果:与篮球运动员和训练者相比,WL表现出更大的偏心平均力(p≤.014,d≥0.03)和更低的飞行时间:收缩时间(p≤.029,d≥0.31)、跳跃高度(p≤.400,d≥0.32)和反应强度指数修正值(p≤.032,d≥0.40)。此外,与训练者相比,WL表现出较低的同心平均力(p=.018,d=0.19)、同心平均功率(p=.008,d=0.29)、偏心峰值力(p=.050,d=.19)和飞行时间(p=.036,d=0.31)。篮球和训练者之间没有显著差异,只有轻微的影响(p>0.05,d<0.1)。结论:这些发现表明鞋类对CMJ的表现有显著影响。WL鞋似乎对CMJ的表现产生了负面影响;然而,篮球和训练者似乎发挥了微不足道的作用,这应该让临床医生和从业者在篮球或训练者中进行短期和长期CMJ测量时对测量和数据质量充满信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信