Re-Evaluating Cranial Pathways of the Internal Carotid Artery in Notoungulata (Mammalia, Panperissodactyla)

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 PALEONTOLOGY
R. Macphee, A. Forasiepi
{"title":"Re-Evaluating Cranial Pathways of the Internal Carotid Artery in Notoungulata (Mammalia, Panperissodactyla)","authors":"R. Macphee, A. Forasiepi","doi":"10.5710/AMGH.06.12.2021.3465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. On the basis of selected osteological markers, Patterson (1936) identified two pathways (here designated A and B) along which the internal carotid artery in notoungulates was said to travel in order to enter the skull and supply the brain. The existence of these pathways, at least as Patterson defined them, has been disputed but no substantive alternatives have been proposed. Using comparative embryological and morphological evidence based on conditions in extant mammals, we find that pathway A (intratympanic) is not supported. Pathway B (enclosed extratympanic) is supportable, but as far as is now known applies only to a small number of notoungulate taxa. On the basis of new evidence, we propose another route, pathway C, briefly mentioned by Scott (1912) but subsequently ignored, that may apply to the majority of notoungulates. In pathway C (unenclosed extratympanic) the internal carotid passed directly into the endocranium via a naturally unossified area of the basicranium, the piriform fenestra, rather than coursing through or alongside the middle ear in a canal. The absence of a separate, bony carotid foramen on the basicranium's ventral surface may explain the hesitancy of previous workers to consider this routing. There is no evidence that the function of the internal carotid artery was supplanted by another vessel (e.g., external carotid artery) in any notoungulate. Conditions in other major clades of South American native ungulates are poorly investigated, but some clearly differed from notoungulates in carotid patterning, pointing to the existence of substantial intertaxon disparities.","PeriodicalId":50819,"journal":{"name":"Ameghiniana","volume":"59 1","pages":"141 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ameghiniana","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.06.12.2021.3465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. On the basis of selected osteological markers, Patterson (1936) identified two pathways (here designated A and B) along which the internal carotid artery in notoungulates was said to travel in order to enter the skull and supply the brain. The existence of these pathways, at least as Patterson defined them, has been disputed but no substantive alternatives have been proposed. Using comparative embryological and morphological evidence based on conditions in extant mammals, we find that pathway A (intratympanic) is not supported. Pathway B (enclosed extratympanic) is supportable, but as far as is now known applies only to a small number of notoungulate taxa. On the basis of new evidence, we propose another route, pathway C, briefly mentioned by Scott (1912) but subsequently ignored, that may apply to the majority of notoungulates. In pathway C (unenclosed extratympanic) the internal carotid passed directly into the endocranium via a naturally unossified area of the basicranium, the piriform fenestra, rather than coursing through or alongside the middle ear in a canal. The absence of a separate, bony carotid foramen on the basicranium's ventral surface may explain the hesitancy of previous workers to consider this routing. There is no evidence that the function of the internal carotid artery was supplanted by another vessel (e.g., external carotid artery) in any notoungulate. Conditions in other major clades of South American native ungulates are poorly investigated, but some clearly differed from notoungulates in carotid patterning, pointing to the existence of substantial intertaxon disparities.
重新评估Notoungulata(哺乳动物,Panperisodactyla)颈内动脉的颅内通路
摘要根据选定的骨学标记,Patterson(1936)确定了两条通路(此处指定为A和B),据说脊骨类动物的颈内动脉沿着这两条通路进入头骨并供应大脑。这些途径的存在,至少正如帕特森所定义的那样,一直存在争议,但没有提出实质性的替代方案。利用基于现存哺乳动物条件的比较胚胎学和形态学证据,我们发现途径A(鼓室内)不受支持。途径B(封闭的鼓外)是可以支持的,但据目前所知,仅适用于少数无蹄类类群。在新证据的基础上,我们提出了另一种途径,途径C,Scott(1912)曾简要提到过,但后来被忽视了,这可能适用于大多数脊骨类动物。在通路C(未封闭的鼓外)中,颈内动脉通过颅底的自然未分类区域梨状开窗直接进入颅内,而不是在耳道中穿过中耳或沿中耳行进。颅底腹面上没有一个单独的颈动脉骨孔,这可能解释了以前的工作人员对考虑这种路线的犹豫。没有证据表明颈内动脉的功能被任何有蹄类动物的另一条血管(如颈外动脉)取代。南美洲本土有蹄类动物的其他主要分支的情况研究较少,但有些分支在颈动脉模式上与脊骨有蹄类明显不同,表明存在显著的轴间差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ameghiniana
Ameghiniana 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Ameghiniana is a bimonthly journal that publishes original contributions on all disciplines related to paleontology, with a special focus on the paleontology of Gondwana and the biotic history of the southern hemisphere. Published yearly since 1957, it has undoubtedly become the main palaeontological publication from Latin America. Ameghiniana has recently broadened its editorial board, reorganized its production process, and increased to a bimonthly frequency, which resulted in a significant decrease in the turn around time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信