Sales and Operations Planning: a comparison between the demand-driven and traditional approaches

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. F. Bozutti, K. F. Espôsto
{"title":"Sales and Operations Planning: a comparison between the demand-driven and traditional approaches","authors":"D. F. Bozutti, K. F. Espôsto","doi":"10.4995/IJPME.2019.9469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supply Chain Management (SCM) is an important concept to establish links among companies. With the aim to reach the SCM goals, companies must define processes that links the decisions areas. In this context, a process to be dealt is the Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP). The S&OP is a tactical planning process, executed on monthly-basis and led by senior management with the aim to balance demand, production, distribution, procurement and finance, to ensure the plans and performance are aligned to support the business strategic plan. In this sense, a literature review was presented in this paper in order to compare the traditional approach and the demand-driven approach for the S&OP. As expected, because of the more complex environment to be dealt in a demand-driven environment, the S&OP evolved to be able to be executed properly. However, further studies in this area should be developed in order to obtain a final framework for the demand-driven S&OP, to analyse applications in industries, to understand performance implications and to develop a performance framework for the demand-driven S&OP.","PeriodicalId":41823,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Management and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Management and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/IJPME.2019.9469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Supply Chain Management (SCM) is an important concept to establish links among companies. With the aim to reach the SCM goals, companies must define processes that links the decisions areas. In this context, a process to be dealt is the Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP). The S&OP is a tactical planning process, executed on monthly-basis and led by senior management with the aim to balance demand, production, distribution, procurement and finance, to ensure the plans and performance are aligned to support the business strategic plan. In this sense, a literature review was presented in this paper in order to compare the traditional approach and the demand-driven approach for the S&OP. As expected, because of the more complex environment to be dealt in a demand-driven environment, the S&OP evolved to be able to be executed properly. However, further studies in this area should be developed in order to obtain a final framework for the demand-driven S&OP, to analyse applications in industries, to understand performance implications and to develop a performance framework for the demand-driven S&OP.
销售和运营规划:需求驱动和传统方法之间的比较
供应链管理是建立企业间联系的一个重要概念。为了实现供应链管理目标,公司必须定义将决策领域联系起来的流程。在这种情况下,要处理的流程是销售和运营规划(S&OP)。S&OP是一个战术规划过程,每月执行,由高级管理层领导,旨在平衡需求、生产、分销、采购和财务,以确保计划和绩效一致,支持业务战略计划。在这个意义上,本文对文献进行了综述,以比较传统方法和需求驱动的S&OP方法。正如预期的那样,由于在需求驱动的环境中需要处理更复杂的环境,S&OP得以正确执行。然而,为了获得需求驱动的S&OP的最终框架,分析行业中的应用,了解性能影响,并为需求驱动的S/OP开发性能框架,应在该领域开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信