Utilization of hybrid fibers in different types of concrete and their activity

IF 1.7 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohammed Hadeed, Abeer M. Humad, Majid Al‐Gburi
{"title":"Utilization of hybrid fibers in different types of concrete and their activity","authors":"Mohammed Hadeed, Abeer M. Humad, Majid Al‐Gburi","doi":"10.1515/jmbm-2022-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this work, the influence of using hybrid fibers on the mechanical properties of two types of concrete: high-strength concrete (HSC) and lightweight concrete (LWC) was studied. Using hybrid fibers instead of using only one type reduced the negative effect on concrete mechanical performance. The glass fiber (GF) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) were used in different contents ranged from 0.2 to 1% as weight % of binder content. Moreover, combinations of both fibers “GF + PPF” were used in contents % of “0.3 + 0.5%,” “0.5 + 0.5%,” “0.3 + 1%,” and “0.5 + 1%.” LWC mixes were prepared by replacing 40% of the coarse aggregate of reference mix with volcanic material (pumice) as a volumetric replacing. To produce HSC, the water-to-cement ratio was reduced to 0.3, 10% silica fume was added, and 1% super plasticizer was used to obtain the consistency. Compressive strength, splitting strength, and flexural strength tests were carried out. The results showed that using 0.7% GF displayed the highest increases in compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength of HSC and LWC mixes. Furthermore, GF exhibited better performance and higher values in compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength tests in comparison with PPF. The optimum hybrid fiber content displaying the highest increment of all tested properties in both concrete types, HSC and LWC, was “0.5% GF + 0.5% PPF.”","PeriodicalId":17354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this work, the influence of using hybrid fibers on the mechanical properties of two types of concrete: high-strength concrete (HSC) and lightweight concrete (LWC) was studied. Using hybrid fibers instead of using only one type reduced the negative effect on concrete mechanical performance. The glass fiber (GF) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) were used in different contents ranged from 0.2 to 1% as weight % of binder content. Moreover, combinations of both fibers “GF + PPF” were used in contents % of “0.3 + 0.5%,” “0.5 + 0.5%,” “0.3 + 1%,” and “0.5 + 1%.” LWC mixes were prepared by replacing 40% of the coarse aggregate of reference mix with volcanic material (pumice) as a volumetric replacing. To produce HSC, the water-to-cement ratio was reduced to 0.3, 10% silica fume was added, and 1% super plasticizer was used to obtain the consistency. Compressive strength, splitting strength, and flexural strength tests were carried out. The results showed that using 0.7% GF displayed the highest increases in compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength of HSC and LWC mixes. Furthermore, GF exhibited better performance and higher values in compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength tests in comparison with PPF. The optimum hybrid fiber content displaying the highest increment of all tested properties in both concrete types, HSC and LWC, was “0.5% GF + 0.5% PPF.”
混杂纤维在不同类型混凝土中的应用及其活性
摘要本文研究了混杂纤维对高强混凝土(HSC)和轻质混凝土(LWC)两种混凝土力学性能的影响。使用混合纤维而不是仅使用一种类型,减少了对混凝土力学性能的负面影响。玻璃纤维(GF)和聚丙烯纤维(PPF)以粘合剂含量的0.2至1%(重量)的不同含量使用。此外,两种纤维的组合“GF+PPF”的含量分别为“0.3+0.5%”、“0.5+0.5%”,“0.3+1%”和“0.5+1%”。LWC混合物的制备方法是用火山材料(浮石)代替参考混合物中40%的粗集料,作为体积置换。为了生产HSC,将水灰比降低到0.3,加入10%的硅灰,并使用1%的超级增塑剂来获得稠度。进行了抗压强度、劈裂强度和弯曲强度试验。结果表明,使用0.7%的GF对HSC和LWC混合物的抗压强度、劈拉强度和弯曲强度的提高最高。此外,与PPF相比,GF在压缩、劈拉和弯曲强度测试中表现出更好的性能和更高的值。在HSC和LWC这两种混凝土类型中,显示出所有测试性能最高增量的最佳混合纤维含量为“0.5%GF+0.5%PPF”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on the micromechanics and nanomechanics of materials, the relationship between structure and mechanical properties, material instabilities and fracture, as well as size effects and length/time scale transitions. Articles on cutting edge theory, simulations and experiments – used as tools for revealing novel material properties and designing new devices for structural, thermo-chemo-mechanical, and opto-electro-mechanical applications – are encouraged. Synthesis/processing and related traditional mechanics/materials science themes are not within the scope of JMBM. The Editorial Board also organizes topical issues on emerging areas by invitation. Topics Metals and Alloys Ceramics and Glasses Soils and Geomaterials Concrete and Cementitious Materials Polymers and Composites Wood and Paper Elastomers and Biomaterials Liquid Crystals and Suspensions Electromagnetic and Optoelectronic Materials High-energy Density Storage Materials Monument Restoration and Cultural Heritage Preservation Materials Nanomaterials Complex and Emerging Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信