Phonemic Awareness Assessment of Children With and Without Speech Sound Disorders: A Comparison Study

Q4 Health Professions
D. Thomas, D. Lance, J. Rainey
{"title":"Phonemic Awareness Assessment of Children With and Without Speech Sound Disorders: A Comparison Study","authors":"D. Thomas, D. Lance, J. Rainey","doi":"10.21849/CACD.2018.00346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High stakes testing and performance-based funding models increase the pressure to accurately identify reading problems in children as early as possible. Assessments used to measure reading-related skills, such as phonemic awareness (PA) have conventionally require verbal (oral) responses. Consequently, measures that require verbal (oral) responses may not accurately measure skills (e.g., oral reading fluency or word finding) in children who exhibit communication issues, specifically, children who do not speak clearly and fluently [1,2], such as children with speech sound disorders (SSD). Purpose: When assessing phonemic awareness (PA) ability, tasks that require verbal (oral) responses are often used. If verbal (oral) answers contain speech sound errors, it may be difficult for the evaluator to determine accuracy of PA skill. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between speech sound production and PA in first and second grade children with and without speech sound disorders (SSD) using a nonverbal (non-oral) response format.","PeriodicalId":10238,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21849/CACD.2018.00346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High stakes testing and performance-based funding models increase the pressure to accurately identify reading problems in children as early as possible. Assessments used to measure reading-related skills, such as phonemic awareness (PA) have conventionally require verbal (oral) responses. Consequently, measures that require verbal (oral) responses may not accurately measure skills (e.g., oral reading fluency or word finding) in children who exhibit communication issues, specifically, children who do not speak clearly and fluently [1,2], such as children with speech sound disorders (SSD). Purpose: When assessing phonemic awareness (PA) ability, tasks that require verbal (oral) responses are often used. If verbal (oral) answers contain speech sound errors, it may be difficult for the evaluator to determine accuracy of PA skill. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between speech sound production and PA in first and second grade children with and without speech sound disorders (SSD) using a nonverbal (non-oral) response format.
有与无语音障碍儿童的音位意识评估:一项比较研究
高风险测试和基于绩效的资助模式增加了尽早准确识别儿童阅读问题的压力。用于测量阅读相关技能的评估,如音位意识(PA),通常需要口头(口头)反应。因此,需要言语(口头)反应的测量可能无法准确测量表现出沟通问题的儿童的技能(例如,口语阅读流利性或单词查找),特别是说话不清晰、不流利的儿童[1,2],例如患有语音障碍(SSD)的儿童。目的:在评估音位意识(PA)能力时,经常使用需要口头(口头)反应的任务。如果口头(口头)回答包含语音错误,评估者可能很难确定PA技能的准确性。本研究旨在使用非言语(非口头)反应形式,调查一年级和二年级有和没有言语声音障碍(SSD)的儿童的言语声音产生与PA之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信