Looking Back at the Past 25 Years and Forward to the Next 25

J. Brunel
{"title":"Looking Back at the Past 25 Years and Forward to the Next 25","authors":"J. Brunel","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earlier in the second half of the 20th century, asset management evolved dramatically as it became common practice to revisit certain principles which had underpinned the institutional world: the introduction of quantitative practices in general and the “discovery” of the efficient frontier in particular forced a rethink of risk-taking and thus portfolio construction. Index investing probably is the single most visible development still visible today. The private wealth world waited longer to embark on the same path of reformation, but made up for its initial lateness by innovating at a fast pace since the early 1990s. Three crucial changes accompanied a gradual shift from the inherited wealth, as the main client, to the advent of new wealth, which was arguably more prepared to ask for new approaches. The recognition that taxes matter and that tax day is everyday was, chronologically, the first, though it capitalized in part on work that had been carried out in the institutional world with certain insurance companies. The advent of open architecture simply reflected a reality which already existed in the institutional world, but was not necessarily appreciated by managers who were “product-driven.” This allowed a broadening of the strategies offered to individuals, including the use of alternative and illiquid strategies. Finally, the recognition of the fact that individuals have multiple goals, multiple time horizons, and different risk tolerances for different goals brought Goals-Based Wealth Management, with a key catalyst being the work of Das, Markowitz, Scheid, and Statman in 2010. Looking ahead, one can see that a lot still has to be done, with an important element probably involving the integration of insurance into the wealth management mix.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"14 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earlier in the second half of the 20th century, asset management evolved dramatically as it became common practice to revisit certain principles which had underpinned the institutional world: the introduction of quantitative practices in general and the “discovery” of the efficient frontier in particular forced a rethink of risk-taking and thus portfolio construction. Index investing probably is the single most visible development still visible today. The private wealth world waited longer to embark on the same path of reformation, but made up for its initial lateness by innovating at a fast pace since the early 1990s. Three crucial changes accompanied a gradual shift from the inherited wealth, as the main client, to the advent of new wealth, which was arguably more prepared to ask for new approaches. The recognition that taxes matter and that tax day is everyday was, chronologically, the first, though it capitalized in part on work that had been carried out in the institutional world with certain insurance companies. The advent of open architecture simply reflected a reality which already existed in the institutional world, but was not necessarily appreciated by managers who were “product-driven.” This allowed a broadening of the strategies offered to individuals, including the use of alternative and illiquid strategies. Finally, the recognition of the fact that individuals have multiple goals, multiple time horizons, and different risk tolerances for different goals brought Goals-Based Wealth Management, with a key catalyst being the work of Das, Markowitz, Scheid, and Statman in 2010. Looking ahead, one can see that a lot still has to be done, with an important element probably involving the integration of insurance into the wealth management mix.
回顾过去25年,展望未来25年
在20世纪下半叶的早些时候,资产管理发生了巨大的变化,因为重新审视支撑制度世界的某些原则成为了一种普遍的做法:一般量化实践的引入,特别是有效前沿的“发现”,迫使人们重新思考风险承担,从而重新思考投资组合的构建。指数投资可能是今天仍然可见的最明显的发展。私人财富世界等待走上同样的改革道路的时间更长,但自20世纪90年代初以来,通过快速创新弥补了最初的滞后。三个关键的变化伴随着从作为主要客户的继承财富逐渐转变为新财富的出现,可以说新财富更愿意寻求新的方法。从时间上看,税收很重要,纳税日是每天的,这是第一个认识到的,尽管它在一定程度上利用了机构界与某些保险公司开展的工作。开放式架构的出现只是反映了机构世界中已经存在的一个现实,但不一定受到“产品驱动”的管理者的赞赏。这使得向个人提供的战略得以扩大,包括使用替代性和非流动性战略。最后,认识到个人有多个目标、多个时间范围和对不同目标的不同风险承受能力,带来了基于目标的财富管理,Das、Markowitz、Scheid和Statman在2010年的工作是一个关键的催化剂。展望未来,我们可以看到还有很多工作要做,其中一个重要因素可能涉及将保险纳入财富管理组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信