Specialised chemistry affects insect abundance but not overall community similarity in three rare shrub willows: Salix myrtilloides, S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia
IF 1.3 3区 农林科学Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Petr Kozel, J. Leong, Igor Malenovský, Jan Šumpich, Jan Macek, Jan Michálek, Nela Nováková, Brian E. Sedio, Carlo L. Seifert, Martin Volf
{"title":"Specialised chemistry affects insect abundance but not overall community similarity in three rare shrub willows: Salix myrtilloides, S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia","authors":"Petr Kozel, J. Leong, Igor Malenovský, Jan Šumpich, Jan Macek, Jan Michálek, Nela Nováková, Brian E. Sedio, Carlo L. Seifert, Martin Volf","doi":"10.14411/eje.2022.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Willows serve as a keystone host-plant genus for insect herbivores. The diversity of insect herbivore assemblages harboured by willows is typically affected by the diversity of specialised metabolites that willows produce. Here, we studied three small, shrubby willow species ( Salix myrtilloides , S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia ) that primarily occur at sites of high conservation value in the Czech Republic. We explored if associated insect communities re fl ect the specialised chemistry in these uncommon host plants. We measured the three willow species for overall metabolomic pro fi les and salicinoids using non-targeted metabolomics and sampled them for caterpillars, leaf-chewing beetles (adults and larvae), saw fl y larvae, and sap-sucking Hemiptera. We detected 2,067 metabolites across the three willow species. Most of them were shared by S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia , while S. myrtilloides showed a distinct chemical pro fi le . Salix repens and S. rosmarinifolia also had signi fi cantly higher concentration and richness of salicinoids than S. myrtilloides . Th e abundance of all insect species and generalists that also feed on host-plants outside Salicaceae was higher on S. myrtilloides than on S. rosmarinifolia or S. repens . The abundance of Salicaceae specialists did not differ among the three willow species. Insect community composition, in contrast, did not show pronounced differences among the three willows. Our results suggest that salicinoids may be responsible for the low abundance of generalist herbivores. Furthermore, our study indicates that herbivore community composition does not re fl ect the specialised chemistry in the three willows we studied. Therefore, we hypothesise that the presence of some of the insect species is primarily determined by other factors, such as the habitat type where the respective willow species occur. Although the studied willows possess some characteristic specialised chemistry, we conclude that their importance as hosts of speci fi c and sometimes threatened insect fauna may be mediated by willow habitat preference.","PeriodicalId":11940,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2022.038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
. Willows serve as a keystone host-plant genus for insect herbivores. The diversity of insect herbivore assemblages harboured by willows is typically affected by the diversity of specialised metabolites that willows produce. Here, we studied three small, shrubby willow species ( Salix myrtilloides , S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia ) that primarily occur at sites of high conservation value in the Czech Republic. We explored if associated insect communities re fl ect the specialised chemistry in these uncommon host plants. We measured the three willow species for overall metabolomic pro fi les and salicinoids using non-targeted metabolomics and sampled them for caterpillars, leaf-chewing beetles (adults and larvae), saw fl y larvae, and sap-sucking Hemiptera. We detected 2,067 metabolites across the three willow species. Most of them were shared by S. repens and S. rosmarinifolia , while S. myrtilloides showed a distinct chemical pro fi le . Salix repens and S. rosmarinifolia also had signi fi cantly higher concentration and richness of salicinoids than S. myrtilloides . Th e abundance of all insect species and generalists that also feed on host-plants outside Salicaceae was higher on S. myrtilloides than on S. rosmarinifolia or S. repens . The abundance of Salicaceae specialists did not differ among the three willow species. Insect community composition, in contrast, did not show pronounced differences among the three willows. Our results suggest that salicinoids may be responsible for the low abundance of generalist herbivores. Furthermore, our study indicates that herbivore community composition does not re fl ect the specialised chemistry in the three willows we studied. Therefore, we hypothesise that the presence of some of the insect species is primarily determined by other factors, such as the habitat type where the respective willow species occur. Although the studied willows possess some characteristic specialised chemistry, we conclude that their importance as hosts of speci fi c and sometimes threatened insect fauna may be mediated by willow habitat preference.
期刊介绍:
EJE publishes original articles, reviews and points of view on all aspects of entomology. There are no restrictions on geographic region or taxon (Myriapoda, Chelicerata and terrestrial Crustacea included). Comprehensive studies and comparative/experimental approaches are preferred and the following types of manuscripts will usually be declined:
- Descriptive alpha-taxonomic studies unless the paper is markedly comprehensive/revisional taxonomically or regionally, and/or significantly improves our knowledge of comparative morphology, relationships or biogeography of the higher taxon concerned;
- Other purely or predominantly descriptive or enumerative papers [such as (ultra)structural and functional details, life tables, host records, distributional records and faunistic surveys, compiled checklists, etc.] unless they are exceptionally comprehensive or concern data or taxa of particular entomological (e.g., phylogenetic) interest;
- Papers evaluating the effect of chemicals (including pesticides, plant extracts, attractants or repellents, etc.), irradiation, pathogens, or dealing with other data of predominantly agro-economic impact without general entomological relevance.