O sentido das súmulas: uma reflexão teórica a partir da análise de discurso de Michel Pêcheux

H. Guimarães, R. Simioni
{"title":"O sentido das súmulas: uma reflexão teórica a partir da análise de discurso de Michel Pêcheux","authors":"H. Guimarães, R. Simioni","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precedents (“Sumulas”) integrate Brazilian legal system intending to provide coherence and consistency to legal decisions. However, such scopes are under threat due to unsystematic and merely positive text-based application of this legal doctrine institute. Contrary to this scenario, this article aims at investigating the meaning of precedents (“sumulas”) in Brazilian law, aiming at pointing out evidences of its discursive materialism and suggesting directions to a rational and democratically manageable legal practice. For this purpose, theoretical contributions of discourse analysis, highlighting concepts developed by Michel Pecheux and comparing them to the problematics of subjective appropriation of precedent (“sumula”) meaning in forensic  praxis .","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"40 1","pages":"122-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p122","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Precedents (“Sumulas”) integrate Brazilian legal system intending to provide coherence and consistency to legal decisions. However, such scopes are under threat due to unsystematic and merely positive text-based application of this legal doctrine institute. Contrary to this scenario, this article aims at investigating the meaning of precedents (“sumulas”) in Brazilian law, aiming at pointing out evidences of its discursive materialism and suggesting directions to a rational and democratically manageable legal practice. For this purpose, theoretical contributions of discourse analysis, highlighting concepts developed by Michel Pecheux and comparing them to the problematics of subjective appropriation of precedent (“sumula”) meaning in forensic  praxis .
摘要的意义:米歇尔pecheux话语分析的理论反思
先例(“Sumulas”)整合了巴西的法律体系,旨在为法律裁决提供连贯性和一致性。然而,由于这一法律学说机构的不系统和仅仅是基于文本的积极应用,这些范围受到了威胁。与此相反,本文旨在探讨巴西法律中先例(“sumulas”)的含义,旨在指出其话语唯物主义的证据,并为理性和民主管理的法律实践指明方向。为此,话语分析的理论贡献,突出了Michel Pecheux提出的概念,并将其与司法实践中主观挪用先例(“sumula”)含义的问题进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信